1994
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.6953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of heterozygosity in cervical carcinoma: subchromosomal localization of a putative tumor-suppressor gene to chromosome 11q22-q24.

Abstract: demonstrated clonal genetic alterations resulting in loss of heterozygosity for one or more markers. Seven of the clonal genetic alterations on chromosome 11 were specific to the long arm, and the overlap between-these and other allelic deletions suggests that a suppressor gene(s) relevant to cervical carcinoma maps to chromosome 11q22-q24.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
65
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(26 reference statements)
3
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, LOH at markers from chromosome arm 11p did not exceed the 20% range (not shown) which, as previously mentioned above for chromosome 10 markers, correspond in our hands to a background of sporadic losses which does not allow the identi®cation of a particular region (Kerangueven et al, 1995a,b,c). The incidence of 50% is in close agreement with ®ndings by other groups (Carter et al, 1994;Hampton et al, 1994b;Koreth et al, 1995). The tumor samples could be separated into two distinct groups, according to their pattern of LOH.…”
Section: Loh At Markers From Chromosome 11supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, LOH at markers from chromosome arm 11p did not exceed the 20% range (not shown) which, as previously mentioned above for chromosome 10 markers, correspond in our hands to a background of sporadic losses which does not allow the identi®cation of a particular region (Kerangueven et al, 1995a,b,c). The incidence of 50% is in close agreement with ®ndings by other groups (Carter et al, 1994;Hampton et al, 1994b;Koreth et al, 1995). The tumor samples could be separated into two distinct groups, according to their pattern of LOH.…”
Section: Loh At Markers From Chromosome 11supporting
confidence: 89%
“…LOH at markers of chromosome region 11q22-23 has been observed in several types of cancer, including bladder (Shaw and Knowles, 1995), cervical (Hampton et al, 1994b;Bethwaite et al, 1995) colorectal (Keldysh et al, 1993), lung (Iizuka et al, 1995), nasopharyngeal (Hui et al, 1996), ovarian (Foulkes et al, 1993;Davis et al, 1996;Gabra et al, 1996) and stomach (Ba a et al, 1996) carcinomas, and in melanomas (Tomlinson et al, 1993;Herbst et al, 1995), and thus may host at least one so-called multiple tumor suppressor gene, the activity of which is not restricted to breast epithelial cells. Further studies will aim at re®ning the localization of this important locus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smallest region of loss could be mapped to 11q22-qter. We have previously mapped the smallest region of chromosome loss on 11q in cervical cancers as 11q22 -24 (Allen et al, 2000) and an identical region has been previously mapped by LOH studies in cervical cancer (Hampton et al, 1994). These data indicate that, in contrast to genes on 3q, those on 3p and 11q may be related to development and progression of anogenital SCC independent of HPV status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Loss of 3p is also frequently seen in cervical SCC, by CGH and LOH analysis (Heselmeyer et al, 1996(Heselmeyer et al, , 1997bLarson et al, 1997;Wistuba et al, 1997;Kersemaekers et al, 1998;Steenbergen et al, 1998;Dellas et al, 1999;Kirchoff et al, 1999;Allen et al, 2000). Loss of 11q has been documented in cervical and other malignancies not related to HPV infection, including breast, colorectal and ovarian cancers and malignant melanoma (Hampton et al, 1994;Kersemaekers et al, 1998;Allen et al, 2000). Loss of 11q was frequently documented in our series of vulvar cancers and was not related to HPV status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Hampton et al (1994) found the smallest region of overlapping LOH at 1 lq22-24. Bethwaite et al (1995) found LOH on 1 1q23, but only with one marker in this region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%