2004
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-0839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of Heterozygosity and Immunohistochemistry of Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagus and Gastric Cardia

Abstract: Purpose: Adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus and gastric cardia are two tumors that have many features in common. They have similar prognoses, treatment modalities, and patterns of dissemination. The etiology is different, with gastroesophageal reflux disease playing a major role for esophageal adenocarcinoma, in contrast to adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia. In the present study, we investigated several genetic and immunohistochemical features of adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus and gastric card… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigation of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is an important tool to detect potential losses of tumor suppressor genes which can characterize different kind of cancers. We and others tried to differentiate adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia according to their LOH pattern, but no significant differences could be identified between the two tumors [56,57]. While van Dekken et al found a significant difference at locus 14Q using comparative genomic hybridization [58], this could not be confirmed in other studies.…”
Section: Genetic Changesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Investigation of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is an important tool to detect potential losses of tumor suppressor genes which can characterize different kind of cancers. We and others tried to differentiate adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia according to their LOH pattern, but no significant differences could be identified between the two tumors [56,57]. While van Dekken et al found a significant difference at locus 14Q using comparative genomic hybridization [58], this could not be confirmed in other studies.…”
Section: Genetic Changesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Scoring of immunohistochemistry was carried out for p53, 28 E-Cadherin, 29 TFF, 30 b-Catenin, 31 COX-2, 32 p16, 33 HuR, 34 C/EBP-b, 15 c-myc 35 and c-jun, as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most interestingly, the LOH events may be involved in the downregulation of the sFRP1 protein expression, as the percentage of LOH at locus D8S532 was significantly lower in the sFRP1 positive cases than in the negative cases (0.00% vs. 22.73%, P < 0.05). LOH has been suggested as a hallmark of the loci for tumorsuppressor genes (Lee et al, 2004;Marsman et al, 2004;Rutherford et al, 2006). When LOH occurs at a tumor suppressor gene that already has genetic lesions on one allele, this will lead to loss of function of this tumor suppressor gene, which can contribute to the development of cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%