2004
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0239-03.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss-of-Function Analysis of EphA Receptors in Retinotectal Mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
125
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in the absence of ephrin-A5 anteroposterior gradient in the superior colliculus (SC) or EphA naso-temporal gradient in the retina, temporal axons (TAs) shift posteriorly. Nasal axons (NAs) therefore face increased competition in posterior SC, lose their affinity for this region and spread out anteriorly 14,45 . On the basis of gain-and loss-of-function analysis, a repulsion/competition model accounting for normal mapping has been proposed 14,46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in the absence of ephrin-A5 anteroposterior gradient in the superior colliculus (SC) or EphA naso-temporal gradient in the retina, temporal axons (TAs) shift posteriorly. Nasal axons (NAs) therefore face increased competition in posterior SC, lose their affinity for this region and spread out anteriorly 14,45 . On the basis of gain-and loss-of-function analysis, a repulsion/competition model accounting for normal mapping has been proposed 14,46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mapping along the N-T axis of these connections has been proposed to use a combination of EphA/ephrin-A signaling (Feldheim et al, 1998(Feldheim et al, , 2000(Feldheim et al, , 2004Frisén et al, 1998;Rashid et al, 2005), patterned retinal activity-dependent axonal refinement (Ruthazer and Cline, 2004;Torborg and Feller, 2005), and axonaxon competition to ensure innervation of the entire target (Walsh et al, 1983;Garraghty, 1995); however, the relative roles of each are not known. Here, using anterograde labeling of RGCs from four retinal poles, we provided the first thorough characterization of the topographic retinogeniculate projection in wildtype mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Mice mutant for ephrins-A2 and -A5 (Frisén et al, 1998;Feldheim et al, 2000), EphA5 (Feldheim et al, 2004), and EphA7 (Rashid et al, 2005) all have topographic mapping defects along the anterior-posterior (A-P) axis of the SC; however, in none of these mutants is topography completely abolished.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1e). We also performed in situ hybridization to detect ephrin-A5 mRNA [28][29][30]41 . This confirmed the presence of an outer > inner gradient of ephrin-A5 mRNA in the LGN that could be seen in both the horizontal (Fig.…”
Section: Epha and Ephrin-a Expression In Postnatal Visual Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations indicate that the nasal-retina versus temporal-retina distinction (as opposed to the left-eye versus righteye distinction) is the key parameter for patterning of eye-specific projections in the LGN. Numerous experiments carried out in lower vertebrates and mice indicate that ephrin-As mediate retinotopic mapping of the nasal-temporal axis in the SC and LGN [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] . We wanted to test whether ephrin-As have a second function in retino-geniculate mapping: dictating the stereotyped patterning of the eye-specific LGN layers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%