1996
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1996.14.9.2584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of estrogen receptor in recurrent breast cancer is associated with poor response to endocrine therapy.

Abstract: Loss of ER expression in recurrent breast cancer should be considered as a cause for poor response to endocrine therapy in primarily ER-positive patients. We conclude that analysis of recurrent tumor samples may improve the predictive value of ER and PR assays.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
194
2
9

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
14
194
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Metastases from ER? tumors may be ER- [7] supporting the hypothesis that ER-expressing and ER-negative breast cancers represent different disease entities [8]. In contrast, a large proportion of the patients with ER?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Metastases from ER? tumors may be ER- [7] supporting the hypothesis that ER-expressing and ER-negative breast cancers represent different disease entities [8]. In contrast, a large proportion of the patients with ER?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Although the analysis was based on the tumour characteristics at presentation rather than at relapse, evidence suggests that c-erbB2 overexpression is similar in primary and metastatic disease (Niehans et al, 1993). Although ER loss has been reported, in most patients with ER-positive primary tumours the recurrent disease is also ER-positive (Kuukasjarvi et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a proportion of cases, patients who initially present with ERα-positive breast cancer, become ERα-negative [5]. The mechanisms by which ERα expression is lost are unclear, although epigenetic silencing of the ERα gene may be involved [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%