2003
DOI: 10.1126/science.1086716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of a Callose Synthase Results in Salicylic Acid-Dependent Disease Resistance

Abstract: Plants attacked by pathogens rapidly deposit callose, a beta-1,3-glucan, at wound sites. Traditionally, this deposition is thought to reinforce the cell wall and is regarded as a defense response. Surprisingly, here we found that powdery mildew resistant 4 (pmr4), a mutant lacking pathogen-induced callose, became resistant to pathogens, rather than more susceptible. This resistance was due to mutation of a callose synthase, resulting in a loss of the induced callose response. Double-mutant analysis indicated t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

35
623
1
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 613 publications
(669 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
35
623
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In such instances, the papilla may seal the wound in the epidermal cell wall caused by the penetration peg, thereby potentially enabling the fungus to avoid recognition by the plant's surveillance mechanism. Consistent with this interpretation is the finding that the pmr4 callose synthase mutant of Arabidopsis has no callose in the papilla matrix and is resistant rather than hypersusceptible to the host powdery mildew (Jacobs et al, 2003;Nishimura et al, 2003). It appears that the host fungus evades recognition by the plant's surveillance mechanism and/or that it is capable of deflecting or detoxifying the plant's defenses.…”
Section: The Plant Trafficking Apparatus In Host Vs Nonhost Responsesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In such instances, the papilla may seal the wound in the epidermal cell wall caused by the penetration peg, thereby potentially enabling the fungus to avoid recognition by the plant's surveillance mechanism. Consistent with this interpretation is the finding that the pmr4 callose synthase mutant of Arabidopsis has no callose in the papilla matrix and is resistant rather than hypersusceptible to the host powdery mildew (Jacobs et al, 2003;Nishimura et al, 2003). It appears that the host fungus evades recognition by the plant's surveillance mechanism and/or that it is capable of deflecting or detoxifying the plant's defenses.…”
Section: The Plant Trafficking Apparatus In Host Vs Nonhost Responsesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Apart from priming for SAdependent resistance, BABA also primes for a faster and stronger deposition of callose-rich papillae under the appressoria of pathogenic fungi and oomycetes. Recently, we found that the callose-deficient mutant pmr4-1 (Nishimura et al, 2003) is blocked in BABA-IR against P. cucumerina and A. brassicicola (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004;J. Ton, unpublished results), suggesting that the augmented callose deposition is important for BABA-IR against these fungi.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Of the PDR genes, only three, including PEN3, changed expression after inoculation with pathogens (see Supplemental Table 3 online) (Nishimura et al, 2003). Although PDR4 was repressed after infection, PDR12 was induced, and its induction was dramatically enhanced in B. g. hordei-inoculated pen3-1 plants.…”
Section: Expression Profiling Of Pen3-1 Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the mutation did not lead to a change in a restriction site, we generated derived CAPS markers using the dCAPS web tool (Neff et al, 1998). The Etr1-1 (Hua and Meyerowitz, 1998), NahG (Morris et al, 2000), rar1-10 , sgt1b , coi1-1 (Xie et al, 1998), pad4-1 (Nishimura et al, 2003), and npr1-1 (Nishimura et al, 2003) primers have been described previously. See Supplemental Table 5 online for a listing of primers used in genotyping mutations.…”
Section: Double Mutant Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%