2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.01.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss models for on and off-design performance of radial inflow turbomachinery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventionally, these losses are categorized as primary and parasitic losses. Primary losses, 21 such as incidence loss, viscous loss, tip clearance loss, and exit kinetic energy loss, occur in the primary flow path 1-2-3, as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.Meridional view of inward flow radial turbine with backface flowpath.
…”
Section: Parasitic Loss Mechanisms and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, these losses are categorized as primary and parasitic losses. Primary losses, 21 such as incidence loss, viscous loss, tip clearance loss, and exit kinetic energy loss, occur in the primary flow path 1-2-3, as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.Meridional view of inward flow radial turbine with backface flowpath.
…”
Section: Parasitic Loss Mechanisms and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors tried to extend the validity of existing correlations developed for ideal gas to organic medium either by combining several loss models [14,15] or by means of the introduction of calibration coefficients and optimization strategies [16]. In the present work it was decided to use the correlation set provided by Meroni et al [16], as it was deemed the most appropriate thanks to the applicability to on-and off-design points and high expansion ratio turbines.…”
Section: Loss Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of loss calculation, Persky et al [13] developed a loss model matching method for analyzing CO 2 and the performance of an R143a working medium turbine. They proposed a loss model with higher accuracy through the preferred physical model and the data were derived directly from their experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%