2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-013-0968-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss in moment capacity of tree stems induced by decay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work clarified the effect of two common defects of trees growing in residential settings, decay and co-dominant stems, which will be useful to practitioners who must assess the likelihood of failure. Much work remains to be done, however, since the range of values of I LOSS for which it was harder to predict the likelihood of red oaks failing at a void corresponds to a wide range of areas of decay (Ciftci et al 2014). Destructively testing trees with extant decay is an important line of future investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our work clarified the effect of two common defects of trees growing in residential settings, decay and co-dominant stems, which will be useful to practitioners who must assess the likelihood of failure. Much work remains to be done, however, since the range of values of I LOSS for which it was harder to predict the likelihood of red oaks failing at a void corresponds to a wide range of areas of decay (Ciftci et al 2014). Destructively testing trees with extant decay is an important line of future investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most sawn voids were not centered on the cross section, we also expected that the probability of failure at a void would not be related to the loss in area. Practitioners assessing decay must consider the area and the location of decay in the cross section (Ciftci et al 2014), and not assume that areas of decay are concentric (Kane and Ryan 2004). Our observations that no trees with less than 22 % loss in area moment of inertia failed at the void and all trees with greater than 54 % loss in area moment of inertia failed at the void are consistent with mensurative studies of standing and failed trees after storms (Smiley and Fraedrich 1992;Kane 2008) and pulling tests of conifers with small amounts of decay (Achim et al 2005;Bergeron et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations