2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Losing sight of oneself in the above-average effect: When egocentrism, focalism, and group diffuseness collide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the characteristics of the first hire, and their relationship to the entrepreneur, may moderate the entrepreneur's ''illusory superiority'' regarding the first hire. Another consideration to be borne in mind is that the phenomenon of illusory superiority may no longer hold when the hiring team consists of more than one individual, because of other social psychological phenomena such as focalism and group diffuseness may play a role and even neutralize any egocentric ''illusory superiority'' effect (Krizan and Suls 2008). Furthermore, entrepreneurs will differ in their degree of overconfidence (Forbes 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the characteristics of the first hire, and their relationship to the entrepreneur, may moderate the entrepreneur's ''illusory superiority'' regarding the first hire. Another consideration to be borne in mind is that the phenomenon of illusory superiority may no longer hold when the hiring team consists of more than one individual, because of other social psychological phenomena such as focalism and group diffuseness may play a role and even neutralize any egocentric ''illusory superiority'' effect (Krizan and Suls 2008). Furthermore, entrepreneurs will differ in their degree of overconfidence (Forbes 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the area of self-esteem, the associations between the two parallel processes tend to be even poorer (see Krizan & Suls, 2008, for a meta-analysis). However, exploring their relationships with different outcomes received a special attention, most often from the clinical domain.…”
Section: Career Adaptabilities At the Interplay Between Explicit And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonselective superiority bias (NSSB) is the phenomenon where participants consistently judge individual members of a positive set of items (e.g., five attractive vacation spots, five pleasant smelling soaps) as superior to most other members in the set (Bruchmann et al, 2013;Giladi & Klar, 2002;Klar, 2002;Krizan & Suls, 2008;Suls et al, 2010;Windschitl, Conybeare, et al, 2008). This systematic judgment of all items in a set as superior to each other violates elementary logic, as some members cannot be better unless others are worse.…”
Section: The Nonselective Superiority Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%