2003
DOI: 10.1111/1540-5893.3702007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Losers: Recovering Lost Property in Japan and the United States

Abstract: This article examines the lost property regime of Japan, which has one of the most impressive reputations in the world for returning lost property to its rightful owner, and compares it with that of the United States. Folk legend attributes Japanese lost-and-found success to honesty and other-regarding preferences. In this article, I focus on another possible explanation: legal institutions that efficiently and predictably allocate and enforce possessory rights. These recognized, centuries-old rules mesh with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In highly corrupt societies, where corruption and law evading practices permeate daily activities, such efforts may be dismissed or received with skepticism either because they do not have teeth to face systemic corruption or because they are not implemented consistently. As corruption is a social and political phenomenon, rather than a cultural one (as suggested by West, 2003, Papakostas, 2012), and is the result of the inability of a bureaucracy to structure interhuman relationships, anti-corruption measures per se will only be effective in situations where corruption occurs occasionally. In short, anti-corruption measures do not address problems of corruption in societies where they are a result of underlying bureaucratic weakness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In highly corrupt societies, where corruption and law evading practices permeate daily activities, such efforts may be dismissed or received with skepticism either because they do not have teeth to face systemic corruption or because they are not implemented consistently. As corruption is a social and political phenomenon, rather than a cultural one (as suggested by West, 2003, Papakostas, 2012), and is the result of the inability of a bureaucracy to structure interhuman relationships, anti-corruption measures per se will only be effective in situations where corruption occurs occasionally. In short, anti-corruption measures do not address problems of corruption in societies where they are a result of underlying bureaucratic weakness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stanley Milgram popularized the lost-letter approach as an alternative to polling public opinion (Milgram et al 1965). Although popularized by Milgram, researchers have a long history that predates Milgram of placing "lost" items in different settings and measuring responses as a form of altruism or unplanned helping (Bihm et al 1979;Fessler 2009;Forbes and Gromoll 1971;Merritt and Fowler 1948;Simon and Gillen 1971;West 2003). A quasi-experimental study provides a highly valid measure of actual incidents of unplanned helping behavior.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some everyday examples suggest that permission is not needed for helpful actions that violate the right of exclusion to a lesser degree. For example, you are allowed to bring lost items to a lost-and-found (e.g., Lastdrager, Montoya, Hartel, & Junger, 2013; West, 2003), to mail a letter you find on the ground (e.g., Milgram, Mann, & Harter, 1965), and to help retrieve objects that were accidently dropped (e.g., Guinote, Cotzia, Sandhu, & Siwa, 2015; Warneken, 2013). Unsolicited repairs violate the right of exclusion more flagrantly (i.e., they involve modifying property) and are not needed to ensure that property is restored to its owner.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%