IEEE 5th International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing 2010 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iswpc.2010.5483704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LOS/NLOS detection for UWB signals: A comparative study using experimental data

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper the problem of detecting the channel state between LOS and NLOS conditions is addressed using UWB signals. A new distribution-based identification approach is proposed and its performance is compared with that of other classic schemes. To this purpose experimental data collected in realistic environments have been used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To distinguish the direct and indirect signal paths, the existing approaches [36][37][38] are mainly based on the criterion that the direct signal path is corresponding to the smallest TOA measurement. However, these approaches are limited in practical use due to the problems of the large number of indirect signal paths in indoor environments, as well as the difficulty of guaranteeing the time synchronization between the Wi-Fi APs and receiver.…”
Section: Signal Path Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To distinguish the direct and indirect signal paths, the existing approaches [36][37][38] are mainly based on the criterion that the direct signal path is corresponding to the smallest TOA measurement. However, these approaches are limited in practical use due to the problems of the large number of indirect signal paths in indoor environments, as well as the difficulty of guaranteeing the time synchronization between the Wi-Fi APs and receiver.…”
Section: Signal Path Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 shows the simulation layout: 12 anchors are located evenly on a circle with a radius of The range measurement error definitions described in [18] (Type I to IV errors) are adopted here. When there is a severe NLOS offset (Type III and IV errors), we assume that NLOS detection and mitigation [1], [16]- [19] are applied, leaving small residual NLOS errors in the range measurements. This effectively results in Type I and II errors [see the model described by (2)].…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the range measurement estimation phase, NLOS links may be detected [16], [17] and severe NLOS links that do not contain much useful range information are discarded. Otherwise, NLOS mitigation methods [1], [18], [19] can be applied to improve the performance. After NLOS detection and mitigation, it is reasonable to assume that the residual NLOS offset is sufficiently small, allowing it to be merged with the Gaussian range error term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the previous research in NLOS detection/mitigation for UWB use the simulated channel model to validate algorithms; although there are some exceptions that use real data [11], [12], [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%