Los dilemas deontológicos del uso de las redes sociales como fuentes de información. Análisis de la opinión de periodistas de tres países

Villegas, Juan Carlos Suárez; Álvarez, Jesús Cruz

doi:10.4185/rlcs-2016-1084

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They also demand greater media independence and impartiality, since the general perception is that they operate in collusion with other entities (government, private companies, advertisers, etc.). These audiences' demands strongly relate to the need for quality journalism in the digital age that has been discussed in the literature (Bakir & McStay, 2018;Campos-Freire et al, 2016;Hedman, 2015;Marchi, 2012;Metag & Rauchfleisch, 2017;Suárez-Villegas & Cruz-Álvarez, 2016).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The spread of gossip, lies and false information is inherent to human beings; what has changed in recent years is the speed of transmission and the ease of generating and spreading them given the characteristics of the Internet (information instantaneity, interactivity, "viralization" and globalization) that multiply the possibilities of being trapped in the disinformation network. (p. 68) Hence, there is a trend that focuses on social media effects on the profession and the quality of journalism (Bakir & McStay, 2018;Campos-Freire et al, 2016;Hedman, 2015;Marchi, 2012;Metag & Rauchfleisch, 2017;Suárez-Villegas & Cruz-Álvarez, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Fake News: Where Journalists and Audiences Meet (and Where They Don’t)

Carazo-Barrantes,

Tristán-Jiménez,

Cajina-Rojas

2023

Contratexto

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article gives voice to two protagonists of the disinformation phenomenon: audiences and journalists. A two-objective comparative analysis is presented: on the one hand, to explore the audiences’ role in stimulating the disinformation phenomenon in Costa Rica and characterize the reception dynamics and interaction that they establish with fake news within the country; on the other hand, to give journalists a voice to compare and contrast their perceptions with their audiences’ perceptions. A qualitative methodology based on semi-structured interviews with a small and non-representative sample of Costa Rican journalists holding leadership positions at some of the country’s most important media outlets was used. Also, six discussion groups with audiences were held. This article performs a comparative analysis of what journalists and participating audiences think about the disinformation phenomenon, the term “fake news,” the responsibilities in the fight against this problem and the possible solutions. The results suggest that, according to journalists, misinformative content circulates on social media and does not come from the traditional media they represent. In contrast, audiences present an antagonistic position since they tend to associate disinformation with the traditional media. However, they also consider traditional media as a source of verification of false content circulating on social media.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fake News: Where Journalists and Audiences Meet (and Where They Don’t)

Carazo-Barrantes,

Tristán-Jiménez,

Cajina-Rojas

2023

Contratexto

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Over time, the media have developed various accountability tools for citizens to held PSM accountable (Rodríguez-Martínez et al, 2017: 256). In recent years, some options have emerged on line, which entails the possibility of more dynamic interaction with the different types of publics: strictu sensu with audiences, but also with citizens in general (Suárez-Villegas and Cruz-Álvarez, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation in the accountability of public service media (PSM). The case of the CCMA

Pascual¹,

Gascón²,

Bentué³

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: This article analyses the transparency of public service media (PSM), and particularly the systems of governance and corporate responsibility of the Catalan Corporation of Audiovisual Media (Corporació Catalana de Mitjans Audiovisuals-CCMA). Methods: the study combines quantitative techniques (performed on periodic reports presented by CCMA executives in public appearances) and qualitative tools (in-depth, unstructured and recorded personalised interviews). Results: the study describes the internal and external accountability tools, their internal dynamics and control mechanisms. Conclusions: the accountability tools that were analysed are valid but have been stagnant for a decade; innovation measures are proposed in view of the need to implement changes in many of them.

show abstract