IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. Transmitting Waves of Progress to the Next Millennium. 2000 Dige
DOI: 10.1109/aps.2000.875424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LOS and NLOS path-loss and delay characteristics at 3.35 GHz in a residential environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
14
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Provided that physical distance between transmitted and receive nodes is known exactly, state of channel can be identified by comparing likelihood values for each of estimates (TOA, RSS, and RDS), conditioned on distance. Shimizu et al [12] performed intensive measurements of path-loss and delay-profile characteristics of LOS and NLOS environments in a suburban residential area. Based on their analysis, they found that the delay spread was dependent on distance, and NLOS delay spread was found to be several times larger than that of LOS case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Provided that physical distance between transmitted and receive nodes is known exactly, state of channel can be identified by comparing likelihood values for each of estimates (TOA, RSS, and RDS), conditioned on distance. Shimizu et al [12] performed intensive measurements of path-loss and delay-profile characteristics of LOS and NLOS environments in a suburban residential area. Based on their analysis, they found that the delay spread was dependent on distance, and NLOS delay spread was found to be several times larger than that of LOS case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NLOS identification and mitigation techniques have been discussed extensively in the literature, but mainly within the cellular network framework [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. For example, in [7], standard deviation of ranging measurements is compared with threshold for NLOS identification, where measurement noise variance is assumed to be known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provided that physical distance between the transmitted and receive nodes is known exactly, the state of the channel can be identified by comparing the likelihood values for each of the estimates (TOA, RSS, and RDS), conditioned on the distance. Shimizu et al [12] performed intensive measurements of path-loss and delay-profile characteristics of LOS and NLOS environments in a suburban residential area. Based on their analysis, they found that the delay spread was dependent on distance, and the NLOS delay spread was found to be several times larger than that of the LOS case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NLOS identification and mitigation techniques have been discussed extensively in the literature, but mainly within cellular network framework [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. For example, in [7], skewness of ranging measurements is compared with threshold for NLOS identification, where measurement noise variance is assumed to be known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NLOS identification and mitigation techniques have been discussed extensively in the literature, but mainly within the cellular network framework [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. For example, in [7], skewness of the ranging measurements is compared with the threshold for NLOS identification, where the measurement noise variance is assumed to be known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%