1972
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(72)90619-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lorenz number and thermal conductivity of liquid and solid mercury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After t > 10 ms the fit to the experimental data achieved by the perturbed values of the thermal conductivity of the melt is discernibly worse than for the optimal value. From this analysis is possible to assert that the thermal conductivity of mercury at 295.6 K is 8.05 W · m −1 · K −1 , which is a value comparable with those reported in the literature for this temperature by other authors [20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Validation Of the Techniquesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…After t > 10 ms the fit to the experimental data achieved by the perturbed values of the thermal conductivity of the melt is discernibly worse than for the optimal value. From this analysis is possible to assert that the thermal conductivity of mercury at 295.6 K is 8.05 W · m −1 · K −1 , which is a value comparable with those reported in the literature for this temperature by other authors [20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Validation Of the Techniquesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…, Prabduram [118]; +, Ewing et al [119]; * , Duggin [120]; ♦, Grosse [121]; , Bush et al [122]; --, Ho et al [123].…”
Section: Molten Metalsunclassified
“…illustrates the wide spread of values that have been reported in the literature in the past [109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123].…”
Section: Molten Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%