2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-012-2279-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lorenz Function of Bi2Te3/Sb2Te3 Superlattices

Abstract: Combining first principles density functional theory and semi-classical Boltzmann transport, the anisotropic Lorenz function was studied for thermoelectric Bi 2 Te 3 /Sb 2 Te 3 superlattices and their bulk constituents. It was found that already for the bulk materials Bi 2 Te 3 and Sb 2 Te 3 , the Lorenz function is not a pellucid function on charge carrier concentration and temperature. For electron-doped Bi 2 Te 3 /Sb 2 Te 3 superlattices large oscillatory deviations for the Lorenz function from the metallic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fig. 4 we see in the temperature range 20 -60 K the Lorenz ratio is very close to its standard Sommerfeld value if the thermoelectric effect is considered, suggesting for our Bi 2 in the literature it is reported that Bi 2 Te 3 single crystals may have a dimensionless Lorenz ratio much larger than unity, [14][15][16] however, those abnormalities are due to the bipolar contributions and the emerging temperature is quite different from and much higher than ours. We note the carrier concentration in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In Fig. 4 we see in the temperature range 20 -60 K the Lorenz ratio is very close to its standard Sommerfeld value if the thermoelectric effect is considered, suggesting for our Bi 2 in the literature it is reported that Bi 2 Te 3 single crystals may have a dimensionless Lorenz ratio much larger than unity, [14][15][16] however, those abnormalities are due to the bipolar contributions and the emerging temperature is quite different from and much higher than ours. We note the carrier concentration in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…As Figures 2 and 3 show, L is far from being constant, deviates significantly from L 0 , and the single-band model fails to consistently capture its variation. [57] This occurs because the integrand factor of κ e (Equation (6)) is broader in energy than the integrand factor of σ (see Figure S2 in the Supporting Information), and consequently κ e decreases slower than σ as μ approaches the band edge. [57] This occurs because the integrand factor of κ e (Equation (6)) is broader in energy than the integrand factor of σ (see Figure S2 in the Supporting Information), and consequently κ e decreases slower than σ as μ approaches the band edge.…”
Section: Carrier Scattering and Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no enhancement of the in‐plane TE transport was found under quantum confinement, as suggested within the concept of Hicks and Dresselhaus. As an additional result, the Lorenz function of the Bi2Te3/Sb2Te3 SL and their directional anisotropy were found to be an intricate function of the SL period . Large deviations from the metallic limit L0 are evident even in the case of large extrinsic charge carrier concentrations, e.g., LL02.…”
Section: Results For Thermoelectric Heterostructuresmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A detailed analysis for the Lorenz function of the Bi2Te3/Sb2Te3 SL was given in refs. , where the directional anisotropy of L was found to be an intricate function of the SL period. Results for the anisotropic bulk Lorenz function of Bi2Te3 are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Transport Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%