2015
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3510-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lorentz-violating inflationary magnetogenesis

Abstract: A non-conformally invariant coupling between the inflaton and the photon in the minimal Lorentz-violating standard model extension is analyzed. For specific forms of the Lorentz-violating background tensor, the strongcoupling and back-reaction problems of magnetogenesis in de Sitter inflation with scale ∼10 16 GeV are evaded, the electromagnetic-induced primordial spectra of (Gaussian and non-Gaussian) scalar and tensor curvature perturbations are compatible with cosmic microwave background observations, and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
(207 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the feasible ways to engender magnetic fields of appropriate strengths seems to be the introduction of a non-minimal coupling term in the action [21,22]. Magnetic fields generated through breaking the conformal invariance of the standard electromagnetic action, due to the presence of a non-minimal coupling term, and with a suitable choice of the parameters involved, have been shown to be of the pertinent amplitude and correlation length to be in concordance with the observations [19,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…One of the feasible ways to engender magnetic fields of appropriate strengths seems to be the introduction of a non-minimal coupling term in the action [21,22]. Magnetic fields generated through breaking the conformal invariance of the standard electromagnetic action, due to the presence of a non-minimal coupling term, and with a suitable choice of the parameters involved, have been shown to be of the pertinent amplitude and correlation length to be in concordance with the observations [19,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…It is interesting to note that in [11] we derived a dynamo flat space-time torsioned extension of GR dynamo equation based on the Lagrangian, or action, for the parity-violating curvature. In the case of the coupling of an axion field to the space-time curvature the term 1 2 μναβ R μνσ τ R αβ σ τ , where R αβνσ is the Riemann tensor, should be included in the analysis of the early universe, which was neglected in the paper of Boyarsky et al [15]. These are exactly the part of parity violation we consider to derive the dynamo equation in the torsion case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second feature is that here we are using a backreaction feature of the magnetic field in LV model, not necessarily in the inflationary era, where it naturally appears. We refer the reader for a detailed discussion of this problem to Campanelli [15]. In his paper the Ratra model is discussed using the inflaton and LV in such a way that the backreaction problems could be avoided.…”
Section: Riemann-cartan Geometry and Lorentz Symmetry Breakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may also consider vector terms in the action that contribute negatively to the energy density, such that the vector's kinetic energy is cancelled out. See [35] for an attempt along this line, and [15] for discussions on negative interaction energy. However it should also be noted that even if the electric fields are cancelled out from the energy density, they can still give rise to Schwinger production of charged particles and prevent the magnetic fields from growing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%