1975
DOI: 10.1119/1.9807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lorentz transformations from the first postulate

Abstract: Spatial geometry of the rotating disk and its non-rotating counterpart Am. J. Phys. 80, 772 (2012) On energy transfers in reflection of light by a moving mirror Am. J. Phys. 80, 684 (2012) A general principle for light reflecting from a uniformly moving mirror: A relativistic treatment Am. J. Phys. 80, 680 (2012) Geometric diagram for relativistic addition of velocities Am. J. Phys. 80, 737 (2012) Fizeau's "aether-drag" experiment in the undergraduate laboratory Am.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the Lorentz transformations [17,18] (1) can be written in the coordinates of inertial frame S as,…”
Section: Stationary Source and Moving Particlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Lorentz transformations [17,18] (1) can be written in the coordinates of inertial frame S as,…”
Section: Stationary Source and Moving Particlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This principle may be applied to the co-ordinate transform, from inertial frame S to frame S 0 at velocity v in S, which must take the same form as the back transform from S 0 to S with velocity Kv (Lee & Kalotas 1975;Lévy-Leblond 1976). The transform must be linear if linear equations in one frame are to transform into linear equations in the other frame.…”
Section: Principle Of Relativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem can be addressed using spacetime algebra with just a few lines of simple algebraic calculations without loosing the physical and geometrical interpretation as in dry formalisms [21]. Furthermore, spacetime algebra can be also used to put in evidence that Einstein's second postulate on the speed of light is not necessary to special relativity [21,22] -a very important physical and epistemological issue, already shown by several authors although using different approaches [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%