2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lorentz factor distribution of blazars from the optical Fundamental Plane of black hole activity

Abstract: Blazar radiation is dominated by a relativistic jet which can be modeled at first approximation using just two intrinsic parameters -the Lorentz factor Γ and the viewing angle θ. Blazar jet observations are often beamed due to relativistic effects, complicating the understanding of these intrinsic properties. The most common way to estimate blazar Lorentz factors needs the estimation of apparent jet speeds and Doppler beaming factors. We present a new and independent method of constructing the blazar Lorentz f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 for γ peak = γ EC peak , and considering ν Syn peak and ν IC peak from Table 1. and in agreement with estimates from radio variability and brightness temperature (confirming early measurements made by Jorstad et al (2005)). Also, Saikia et al (2016) introduced a new independent method based on the optical fundamental plane of black hole activity 5 to estimate the Γ distribution, showing a valid range from 1 to 40, with N (Γ) ∝ Γ −2.1±0.4 , or an even more restrictive range with Γ between 15 and 30 (Nalewajko et al 2014), as deduced from a study of γ-ray flares, with a multifrequency approach and testing EC scenarios. There are two different setups that are important to consider, and that are related to the photon-frequency (ν) associated with the external photon field.…”
Section: Assuming a Dominant Ec Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 for γ peak = γ EC peak , and considering ν Syn peak and ν IC peak from Table 1. and in agreement with estimates from radio variability and brightness temperature (confirming early measurements made by Jorstad et al (2005)). Also, Saikia et al (2016) introduced a new independent method based on the optical fundamental plane of black hole activity 5 to estimate the Γ distribution, showing a valid range from 1 to 40, with N (Γ) ∝ Γ −2.1±0.4 , or an even more restrictive range with Γ between 15 and 30 (Nalewajko et al 2014), as deduced from a study of γ-ray flares, with a multifrequency approach and testing EC scenarios. There are two different setups that are important to consider, and that are related to the photon-frequency (ν) associated with the external photon field.…”
Section: Assuming a Dominant Ec Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A&A 616, A63 2018Also, Saikia et al (2016) introduced a new independent method based on the optical fundamental plane of black hole activity 5 to estimate the Γ distribution, showing a valid range from 1 to 40, with N (Γ) ∝ Γ −2.1 ± 0.4 , or an even more restrictive range with Γ between 15 and 30 (Nalewajko et al 2014), as deduced from a study of γ-ray flares, with a multifrequency approach and testing EC scenarios.…”
Section: Assuming a Dominant Ec Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A power-law distribution of Lorentz factors for AGNs can be assumed, ( ) G~G -N a , where population synthesis studies show that a value of a between 1.5 and 1.75 provides a good match between a synthetic and observed distribution of apparent velocities (Lister & Marscher 1997;Marscher 2006b). Recent work indicates a value of =  a 2.1 0.4 for blazars (Saikia et al 2016). Many observations indicate that GRBs are produced by ultra-relativistic outflows with  G 100.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given these solutions, if acceleration were to take place at a mildly relativistic recollimation shock, this would lead to an initial bulk Lorentz factor of the jet of Γ j<|s ≈ 10 3 for 1ES 0229+200, while for 1ES 1101−232, it would result in Γ j<|s ≈ 500. Such large jet Lorentz factors are problematic given that the usually assumed values for less extreme blazars, based on observations with very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI) and on models of relativistic jets, are of the order of a few to a few tens (Pushkarev et al 2009;Saikia et al 2016).…”
Section: Scenario Ii: Co-acceleration On Mildly Relativistic Shocksmentioning
confidence: 99%