2020
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2019.2948872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LoRa Technology Demystified: From Link Behavior to Cell-Level Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These sensors communicate with the GW module by means of different SFs, and as a communication channel, 868.3 MHz is used. For the conducted tests, the payload has been set to 12 bytes, due to considering this the average dimension of a LoRa packet [35]. In these experiments, a handful of test scenarios has been performed for the validation of the developed traffic generator.…”
Section: Lora Traffic Generator Development and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sensors communicate with the GW module by means of different SFs, and as a communication channel, 868.3 MHz is used. For the conducted tests, the payload has been set to 12 bytes, due to considering this the average dimension of a LoRa packet [35]. In these experiments, a handful of test scenarios has been performed for the validation of the developed traffic generator.…”
Section: Lora Traffic Generator Development and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state of the art (Section IV) has modeled LoRa networks by using stochastic geometry [9,16,[18][19][20] or by extending well-known models for contention-based channel access [14,21,22]. However, these models consider simple network layouts with only one gateway [9,16,18,19], or make strict assumptions about the spatial distribution of nodes [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…frames that are set with different spreading factors (SF) are orthogonal to each other and do not cause interference, has been assumed considering that there is at least 16dB co-channel rejection between any different SF couples [4], [5], [6], [7]. This assumption however, has not been taken by others when analyzing the performance of LoRa networks [8], [9], [10], [11]. In order to have a more realistic scenario and include the effect of all possible interference, this letter also considers imperfect orthogonality between SFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frame error and symbol rates were approximated through deriving low complexity formulas [5]. For a singlecell LoRa network under imperfect orthogonality condition, the success and coverage probabilities have been analytically analyzed [8], throughout of uplink has been theoretically analyzed [9], LoRa's link level performance and network capacity have been experimentally and analytically analyzed taking the frame transmission period into account [10] and experimental and simulations results have shown that packet loss due to imperfect orthogonality is an issue in LoRa network [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%