2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2101.05008
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loose cores and cycles in random hypergraphs

Abstract: Inspired by the study of loose cycles in hypergraphs, we define the loose core in hypergraphs as a structure which mirrors the close relationship between cycles and 2-cores in graphs. We prove that in the r-uniform binomial random hypergraph H r (n, p), the order of the loose core undergoes a phase transition at a certain critical threshold and determine this order, as well as the number of edges, asymptotically in the subcritical and supercritical regimes.Our main tool is an algorithm called CoreConstruct, wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case when j = 1, the lower bound was Θ(ε 2 n) while the upper bound was Θ(εn). This upper bound in the case when j = 1 was subsequently improved by the author, Kang and Zalla [8] and shown to be Θ(ε 2 n) in the range when p = (1 + ε)p 0 (although the results of that paper also cover the range p = c/n for any constant c > 1). The strategy used was to prove an upper bound on the length of the longest loose cycle which transfers to an upper bound for loose paths using a standard sprinkling argument, just as has been often observed for graphs.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In the case when j = 1, the lower bound was Θ(ε 2 n) while the upper bound was Θ(εn). This upper bound in the case when j = 1 was subsequently improved by the author, Kang and Zalla [8] and shown to be Θ(ε 2 n) in the range when p = (1 + ε)p 0 (although the results of that paper also cover the range p = c/n for any constant c > 1). The strategy used was to prove an upper bound on the length of the longest loose cycle which transfers to an upper bound for loose paths using a standard sprinkling argument, just as has been often observed for graphs.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 89%