2000
DOI: 10.1111/0033-3352.00113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loose Cannons and Rule Breakers, or Enterprising Leaders? Some Evidence About Innovative Public Managers

Abstract: One element of the debate over New Public Management concerns public‐sector entrepreneurship. Critics see entrepreneurs as people prone to rule breaking, self‐promotion, and unwarranted risk taking, while proponents view them as exercising leadership and taking astute initiatives. This article examines two samples of the best applications to the Ford Foundation—Kennedy School of Government innovation awards, one between 1990 and 1994 and the other between 1995 and 1998, to see whether they are more consistent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
216
0
15

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
216
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Most research emphasizes the role of MMs as key drivers of CE. For instance, MMs are identified as the most entrepreneurial people (Morris and Jones 1999), the largest group of initiators (Borins 2000), and the main source of creativity in entrepreneurship (Bernier and Hafsi 2007). Yet, this significant contribution of MMs cannot be taken for granted and cannot be understood in isolation of their TMT's influence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research emphasizes the role of MMs as key drivers of CE. For instance, MMs are identified as the most entrepreneurial people (Morris and Jones 1999), the largest group of initiators (Borins 2000), and the main source of creativity in entrepreneurship (Bernier and Hafsi 2007). Yet, this significant contribution of MMs cannot be taken for granted and cannot be understood in isolation of their TMT's influence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social innovation, defined as a positive change at the conceptual, process, product or organizational level, implies a novel use of resources that contributes to the achievement of social goals (Borins, 2000;Mair & Marti, 2006;Megre, Martins, & Salvado, 2012;Peredo & Chrisman, 2006). The scalability of social entrepreneurship refers to the ability to successfully replicate the business model in other places, in order to continue generating social benefits (Martin & Osberg, 2007;Yunus, 2010).…”
Section: Social Enterprises and Empowerment Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of private sector business models to the public sector is something that has not extensively been explored as there are mixed views with some people contenting that it is immoral to advocate private sector managerial practices into the public sector (Heifetz,1994;Borins, 2000). Heifetz (1994) argues against prescribing private sector management models to the public sector because the problems encountered in the public sector are different and beyond the capacity of any one person to frame and because of the need to comply to very strict government rules and regulations in some cases.…”
Section: International Conference On Education Reform and Modern Manamentioning
confidence: 99%