2022
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-15-4689-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

loopUI-0.1: indicators to support needs and practices in 3D geological modelling uncertainty quantification

Abstract: Abstract. To support the needs of practitioners regarding 3D geological modelling and uncertainty quantification in the field, in particular from the mining industry, we propose a Python package called loopUI-0.1 that provides a set of local and global indicators to measure uncertainty and features dissimilarities among an ensemble of voxet models. Results are presented of a survey launched among practitioners in the mineral industry, enquiring about their modelling and uncertainty quantification practice and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the existing implicit methods can generate various models by perturbing the inputs to characterize uncertainties, they might not explore a broad range of possible geological patterns and structural relationships in nature through a single model suit for stochastic simulation (Jessell et al, 2022). Working on the automation of modeling workflow, our CNN is beneficial for a flexible interpretation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties (Pirot et al, 2022) by generating diverse modeling realizations instead of one best realization due to its high computational efficiency.…”
Section: Structural Uncertainty Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the existing implicit methods can generate various models by perturbing the inputs to characterize uncertainties, they might not explore a broad range of possible geological patterns and structural relationships in nature through a single model suit for stochastic simulation (Jessell et al, 2022). Working on the automation of modeling workflow, our CNN is beneficial for a flexible interpretation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties (Pirot et al, 2022) by generating diverse modeling realizations instead of one best realization due to its high computational efficiency.…”
Section: Structural Uncertainty Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the existing implicit methods can generate various models by perturbing the inputs to characterize uncertainties, they might not explore a broad range of possible geological patterns and structural relationships in nature through a single model suit for stochastic simulation (Jessell et al, 2022). Working on the automation of modeling workflow, our CNN is beneficial for a flexible interpretation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties (Pirot et al, 2022) by generating diverse modeling realizations instead of one best realization due to its high computational efficiency.…”
Section: Structural Uncertainty Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%