2020
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loop-closure kinetics reveal a stable, right-handed DNA intermediate in Cre recombination

Abstract: In Cre site-specific recombination, the synaptic intermediate is a recombinase homotetramer containing a pair of loxP DNA target sites. The enzyme system's strand-exchange mechanism proceeds via a Holliday-junction (HJ) intermediate; however, the geometry of DNA segments in the synapse has remained highly controversial. In particular, all crystallographic structures are consistent with an achiral, planar Holliday-junction (HJ) structure, whereas topological assays based on Cre-mediated knotting of plasmid DNAs… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since, for LiCre, the steps of synapse assembly and catalysis are not expected to be faster (LiCre was derived from Cre by reducing, rather than increasing, its propensity to assemble the complex and achieve the reaction), the main difference between in vitro (Shoura et al, 2012) and in vivo (this study) R 0 values likely lies into the probability of forming a DNA loop bringing the two loxP sites together (a pre-requisite to synapse formation). This probability depends on the mechanical properties of the inter- loxP DNA segment (Rosa et al, 2010; Shoura et al, 2020); it may thus differ strongly between a stiff inter- loxP segment of naked dsDNA in vitro and a softer, chromatinized one in vivo (Hajjoul et al, 2013; Ringrose et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since, for LiCre, the steps of synapse assembly and catalysis are not expected to be faster (LiCre was derived from Cre by reducing, rather than increasing, its propensity to assemble the complex and achieve the reaction), the main difference between in vitro (Shoura et al, 2012) and in vivo (this study) R 0 values likely lies into the probability of forming a DNA loop bringing the two loxP sites together (a pre-requisite to synapse formation). This probability depends on the mechanical properties of the inter- loxP DNA segment (Rosa et al, 2010; Shoura et al, 2020); it may thus differ strongly between a stiff inter- loxP segment of naked dsDNA in vitro and a softer, chromatinized one in vivo (Hajjoul et al, 2013; Ringrose et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty to obtain experimentally structural information through X-ray crystallography about this Nt tail has so far precluded any detailed study on its possible involvement in DNA target recognition in Cre-like SSRs. Besides the extensive studies performed on this recombination system by X-ray crystallography [12] , several other biophysical experimental and computer-aided studies focusing on DNA topology, kinetics of DNA-loop formation and synapsis geometry have been directed towards acquiring information about the conformational dynamics, stability and topology of reaction intermediates and, thus, the recombination mechanisms of the Cre recombinase and related systems [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] . These studies have provided relevant structural, dynamic and functional mechanistic information on these recombinase systems and a complementary view to the one provided by X-ray crystallography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%