2009
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/03/139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loop bounds on non-standard neutrino interactions

Abstract: We reconsider the bounds on non-standard neutrino interactions with matter which can be derived by constraining the four-charged-lepton operators induced at the loop level. We find that these bounds are model dependent. Naturalness arguments can lead to much stronger constraints than those presented in previous studies, while no completely model-independent bounds can be derived. We will illustrate how large loop-contributions to four-charged-lepton operators are induced within a particular model that realizes… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After performing the rescaling (18) and the field rotation (20), the kinetic terms are canonical and the charged lepton mass matrix is diagonal, whereas the interaction terms are not diagonal. For later convenience, we rotate the neutrino fields as ν L → L m ν L , in order to keep them as much aligned as possible with their charged partners.…”
Section: One Loop Nsimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After performing the rescaling (18) and the field rotation (20), the kinetic terms are canonical and the charged lepton mass matrix is diagonal, whereas the interaction terms are not diagonal. For later convenience, we rotate the neutrino fields as ν L → L m ν L , in order to keep them as much aligned as possible with their charged partners.…”
Section: One Loop Nsimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact triggered renewed interest at present neutrino facilities [14][15][16][17][18][19]. The typical bounds on production and detection NSIs are about ε µτ ∼ 10 −2 [20,21]. Higher sensitivities, of ε µτ ∼ < 10 −3 are within the reach of future neutrino experiments [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the running time is doubled, no significant improvement is gained, indicating that the limiting factor is not statistics. These bounds are a significant improvement upon the current bounds [161,162], but not as strong as those which the Neutrino Factory can obtain.…”
Section: Non-standard Interactions In a Low-energy Neutrino Factorymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Model-independent experimental constraints on the ε s,d,m αβ range from 10 −4 to O(1) [16,[159][160][161][162], while model-dependent limits are often much tighter [163,164] since, in concrete models, NSI in the neutrino sector are usually accompanied by non-standard effects in the charged-lepton sector that are constrained, for example, by rare decay searches or measurements of the weak mixing angle.…”
Section: Effective Theory Of New Physics In the Neutrino Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several such operators [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], depending on the production mechanism of the neutrino beam (π decay for conventional neutrino beams and super-beam experiments, β decay for β-beam and reactor experiments and µ decays for neutrino factories). We will classify the new physics operators in three different categories:…”
Section: New Physics At Near Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%