2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1629286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking Forward: Theory-Based Measures of Chronic Poverty and Vulnerability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using these five variables as proxies for household agency extends Carter and Ikegami's (2007) theoretical treatment of the determinants of poverty trap thresholds. In that simulation, the authors suggest that a latent concept of intrinsic ability conditions how high the minimum assets need to be in order to gravitate toward a higher welfare equilibrium.…”
Section: (Ii) Household Agency Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using these five variables as proxies for household agency extends Carter and Ikegami's (2007) theoretical treatment of the determinants of poverty trap thresholds. In that simulation, the authors suggest that a latent concept of intrinsic ability conditions how high the minimum assets need to be in order to gravitate toward a higher welfare equilibrium.…”
Section: (Ii) Household Agency Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sen, it provides a natural bridge between an HD/C perspective and Carter and Ikegami's (2007) theoretical study on the role of a latent concept labeled intrinsic ability. Thus, a workable definition of intrinsic ability lies within the capability literature's treatment of agency.…”
Section: (C) Observing Intrinsic Ability As Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the poor often lack financial collateral, microfinance institutions facilitate repayment through 'solidarity groups', in which members repay together before repeat loans are granted. Whereas these programmes address the needs of the poor, the 'very poor' and the 'chronically poor' often remain excluded as they are perceived to be a credit risk even by those in their community [80]. Recognizing the different dimensions and gradations of poverty has been the subject of much discussion in the microfinance literature, with many institutions developing innovations to expand their reach among the poorest [81][82][83].…”
Section: Impacts On Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the direct income effect, indirect income effect through non-financial benefits such as added training and education and, nonpecuniary effects such as strengthened social networks and better self-esteem (de Aghion and Morduch 2006). Recent studies have expressed concerns regarding the adequacy of income-poverty measures alone in understanding vulnerability (Calvo and Dercon 2005;Carter and Ikegami 2007;Dercon and Krishnan 2000;Dercon 2005;Glewwe and Hall 1998;Ligon and Schechter 2002). The cumulative impact of microfinance organizations on household vulnerability may therefore not be captured by standard income poverty measures alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%