2019
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking for ancillary signals around GW150914

Abstract: We replicated the procedure in Liu and Jackson [1], who had found evidence for a low amplitude signal in the vicinity of GW150914. This was based upon the large correlation between the time integral of the Pearson cross-correlation coefficient in the off-source region of GW150914, and the Pearson cross-correlation in a narrow window around GW150914, for the same time lag between the two LIGO detectors as the gravitational wave signal. Our results mostly agree with those in Liu and Jackson [1]. We find the stat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monitoring the correlation in the data collected by independent interferometers constitutes an interesting method to test the unexpected. Some publications have explored this direction analyzing the LIGO data streams with known events [16][17][18][19][20][21]. It turns out that several subtleties jeopardize the reliability of such a test [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Monitoring the correlation in the data collected by independent interferometers constitutes an interesting method to test the unexpected. Some publications have explored this direction analyzing the LIGO data streams with known events [16][17][18][19][20][21]. It turns out that several subtleties jeopardize the reliability of such a test [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] concludes that this mismatch for GW150914 is not statistically significant once one takes care of subtleties, such as whitening versus notching or discrepancies in the best fit waveforms. Still, some debate remains over the exact size of the statistical significance [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%