2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking beyond the mortality of bycatch: sublethal effects of incidental capture on marine animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
78
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Even without accounting for potential sublethal effects of hawksbill captures, such as fitness and reproduction impairment (Wilson et al, 2014), or post-release mortality (Snoddy & Southwood-Williard, 2010), which could further exacerbate impacts to the population, (Gaos et al, 2017). Curved carapace lengths listed in 1 cm increments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even without accounting for potential sublethal effects of hawksbill captures, such as fitness and reproduction impairment (Wilson et al, 2014), or post-release mortality (Snoddy & Southwood-Williard, 2010), which could further exacerbate impacts to the population, (Gaos et al, 2017). Curved carapace lengths listed in 1 cm increments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, longline fishing pressure was not found to have statistically significant, direct detrimental effects on this population (Rolland et al 2009), unlike other pressures. Wilson et al (2014) highlighted the paucity of reports on incidentally caught seabirds being released alive compared with other marine organisms. Few seabirds are usually able to escape from pelagic longline fishing gear indeed (but see Huang and Liu 2010), and as a result sub-lethal effects of bycatch remain virtually undocumented for seabirds today (as opposed to crustaceans and mammals, Wilson et al 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Other approaches, including population models and individual-borne camera surveys, suggested that interactions with fishing vessels may not have systematically significant, direct detrimental effects on seabirds (e.g., Rolland et al 2009;Sakamoto et al 2009;Barbraud et al 2011). Despite this figure, a recent review (Wilson et al 2014) highlighted the paucity of reports on incidentally caught seabirds being released alive, thus potentially hampering perspectives about sub-lethal effects of bycatch on seabirds. Here we report the intriguing case of an Indian yellow-nosed albatross Thalassarche carteri re-sighted on a monitored colony in the southern Indian Ocean, after an apparent non-lethal capture by a longlining vessel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is determined by the nature of the capture process used (Wilson et al, 2014) and also by the post-capture handling procedures (Milligan et al, 2009;Raicevich et al, 2011;Leocádio et al, 2012;Lorenzon et al, 2013). Improved practices in trawl fisheries, such as on-board recovery tanks, have made it possible to increase the proportion of trawl-caught crustaceans that can be transported alive successfully (Albalat et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%