2000
DOI: 10.2307/4352423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking at Lovemaking: Constructions of Sexuality in Roman Art, 100 B.C.-A.D. 250

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While archaeologically elusive, such emotions are part of the human condition and must have played out in various aspects of material culture. The link between phallic representations and/or sexual imagery with humour is well attested in the Roman world; indeed the inducement of laughter was partly what empowered the phallus to counter the evil eye (Richlin 1992;Clarke 2001;Pearce 2020). Another parallel is found in the 'grotesque' figure from a third century AD well in the extramural settlement of Rainau-Buch, Germany, where a wooden phallus made use of a cylindrical socket for insertion into the carved wooden figure (Greiner 2008: 214-215).…”
Section: Projecting Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While archaeologically elusive, such emotions are part of the human condition and must have played out in various aspects of material culture. The link between phallic representations and/or sexual imagery with humour is well attested in the Roman world; indeed the inducement of laughter was partly what empowered the phallus to counter the evil eye (Richlin 1992;Clarke 2001;Pearce 2020). Another parallel is found in the 'grotesque' figure from a third century AD well in the extramural settlement of Rainau-Buch, Germany, where a wooden phallus made use of a cylindrical socket for insertion into the carved wooden figure (Greiner 2008: 214-215).…”
Section: Projecting Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lieberman's (2017) popular history of sex toys in the USA includes some discussion of their use in earlier periods across the world but directs limited attention to the material evidence. We can assume, however, that such objects existed in other past societies, and this is strongly supported in texts and artistic representations from the Graeco-Roman world (Nelson 2000;Clarke 2001). Yet they rarely feature in archaeological finds registers or discussions, and there are limited archaeological comparanda.…”
Section: Sexual Implementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a discussion of the handbooks, see Parker 1992, 92-94. 33 Several important examples: Johns (1982) makes the critical distinction between mythological and non-mythological subjects in erotica; Keuls (1985) examines power dynamics and sex in Greek art; Clarke's work on Roman art remains foundational in scope, methodology, and analysis ;Clarke 1998;. More recently, Vout (2013 discusses a range of themes in Greek and Roman erotic imagery.…”
Section: Female Pleasure and Status In The Visual Artsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notable studies of Campanian painting include Frederik 2002 on the erotic gaze; Elsner 2007, 67-109 on parallels in ecphrasis and painting; Squire 2016; Platt and Squire 2017. A different approach has been taken by Clarke 1998Clarke , 2003Clarke , and 2007, who challenges the notion of a generic Roman Viewer constructed from fragmentary texts of elite male writers and considers a range of viewers, including slaves, freedmen, women, old, young, straight, and gay. The present essay focuses on one aspect of viewing in narrative scenes, namely the shifting viewpoints and levels of awareness of depicted figures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%