DOI: 10.3990/1.9789036551267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Look who's talking: appearance of embodied conversational agents in eHealth

Abstract: Welcome! Nice to meet you, my name is Sylvia. I will be guiding you throughout this thesis. I will provide you with a quick summary at the beginning of every chapter. I must say, I found it very interesting. I hope you enjoy reading it too. See you soon! vi CONTENTS 01 General Introduction 02 Design Features of Embodied Conversational Agents (ECAs) in eHealth: a Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(146 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The appearance and name intended to be gender-neutral, so users could interpret this for themselves. This might contribute to observer-target similarity as proposed by Paiva et al [13], which is also confirmed by [34], who found that older adults prefer an ECA image that is similar in age and gender. While it was requested that the general appearance is neutral, the ECA should be expressive and show a range of emotions through their facial expressions.…”
Section: Design Requirements For Ecas Personality and Appearancesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The appearance and name intended to be gender-neutral, so users could interpret this for themselves. This might contribute to observer-target similarity as proposed by Paiva et al [13], which is also confirmed by [34], who found that older adults prefer an ECA image that is similar in age and gender. While it was requested that the general appearance is neutral, the ECA should be expressive and show a range of emotions through their facial expressions.…”
Section: Design Requirements For Ecas Personality and Appearancesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…A lack of content and an absence of his personality were cited as reasons for Carlos being least preferred. This paper also shows that the participants were more positive about the different coaches at first sight compared to after four weeks of using the COUCH system ( Ter Stal et al, 2021 ). The second paper, from Beinema et al (2021) looks specifically at the difference in lengths of interaction in situations where the user chooses the topic of discussion versus situations in which the system suggests a topic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This suggestion is supported by two other papers that have analysed the results of this same study from different perspectives. The work of Ter Stal et al (2021) described which of the coaches in the COUCH system was preferred most/least often and why. This work shows that most older adults did not have a preference for one specific coach, but the coach that is mentioned most often was Olivia (the physical activity coach).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECAs often have a human-like appearance and communicate via prewritten dialogue. They also have the ability to establish and maintain an empathic relationship by using empathic behavior, both verbal, via text or speech, and nonverbal, via facial and gaze expressions and hand and body gestures [ 9 ]. These behaviors may make them more engaging than traditional eHealth interventions [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%