2020
DOI: 10.1177/1747493020951941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Look closer: The multidimensional patterns of post-stroke burden behind the modified Rankin Scale

Abstract: Background The utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale, representing patient perspectives of quality of life, is a newly proposed measure to improve the interpretability of the modified Rankin Scale. Despite obvious advantages, such weighting imperfectly reflects the multidimensional patterns of post-stroke burden. Aims To investigate multidimensional patterns of post-stroke burden formed by individual domains of Assessment of Quality of Life and Barthel Index for each modified Rankin Scale category. Methods In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 However, our findings have additionally demonstrated the importance of initial stroke severity for independent walking, a highly valued outcome for survivors post-stroke, 4 but one which is inadequately captured by common post-stroke outcomes (eg, mRS). 8 The observed significant differences between the levels of severity (ie, mild, moderate, severe) and long-term walking outcomes signifies the need to investigate appropriate tailoring of rehabilitation interventions to each severity subgroup in future clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…27 However, our findings have additionally demonstrated the importance of initial stroke severity for independent walking, a highly valued outcome for survivors post-stroke, 4 but one which is inadequately captured by common post-stroke outcomes (eg, mRS). 8 The observed significant differences between the levels of severity (ie, mild, moderate, severe) and long-term walking outcomes signifies the need to investigate appropriate tailoring of rehabilitation interventions to each severity subgroup in future clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prestroke variables were comorbidities noted in the medical history (hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation; all defined as present or absent). Stroke-related variables were stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS), 22 considered as a continuous variable and in subgroups (mild (0-7), moderate (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16), severe (>16)), stroke type (ischaemic, haemorrhagic), Oxfordshire Stroke Classification 23 subgroups (total anterior circulation infarct (TACI), partial anterior circulation infarct (PACI), posterior circulation infarct (POCI), lacunar infarct (LACI), intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH)), ischaemic stroke location (large cortical, small cortical, hemispheric lacunar, brainstem, cerebellum, other, no infarct on imaging), stroke hemisphere (left, right, brainstem, not evident on imaging, unknown) and thrombolysis treatment with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (yes, no). Stroke-related variables of stroke type, ischaemic stroke location and stroke hemisphere were reported based on information from routine neuroimaging (CT or MRI) performed at the local hospital.…”
Section: Variables Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is no doubt that these treatments have transformed stroke care. However, stroke clinicians are now shifting their focus to improvements in rehabilitation and post-acute care (63)(64)(65)(66). Post-stroke cognitive impairment is identified as a key priority area for research and support by stroke survivors, but predictive models for individualised risk factors for cognitive decline are sorely needed (67).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a score of 0 or 1 meaning excellent function, or a score between 0 and 2 meaning good function), it is a measure of global impairment and does not consider the specific areas that a stroke survivor may have been impacted by their stroke, nor the relative severity of this impact across each area. 33 As a result of this, other measures are often used to provide a more detailed understanding of patient outcomes. One such measure is the 4-dimensional Assessment of Quality of Life 34 (AQoL-4D), a multi-attribute outcome scoring system which assigns a utility value across the quality of life domains Independent Living (mobility as well as ability to perform self-care and household tasks), Relationships (friendships, role in family, level of isolation), Mental Health (pain, worry and sleeping habits), and Senses (ability to see, hear and communicate).…”
Section: Clinical Context Of Stroke Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%