Longitudinal variations of positive dayside ionospheric storms related to recurrent geomagnetic storms

Abstract

[1] We have performed an analysis of case events and statistics of positive ionospheric storms in the dayside region of the equatorial ionization anomaly during recurrent geomagnetic storms (RGSs), which dominate in geomagnetic and ionospheric conditions on the declining phase of solar activity in 2004 to 2008. It is shown that total electron content (TEC) has a tendency to minimize before the beginning of RGSs and to peak 3 to 4 days after, i.e., on the RGS recovery phase produced by high-intensity long-duration continuous auroral activity. The maximum of TEC coincides with the maximum of solar wind velocity within high-speed solar wind streams. An analysis of electron content vertical profiles, derived from two independent methods using ionosondes and Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate /Formosa Satellite mission-3 radio occultation, showed that in the maximum of an ionospheric storm on 28 March 2008, the F2 layer thickens, NmF2 increases by~50%, and hmF2 elevates by a few tens of kilometers. The response of positive ionospheric storms to solar, heliospheric, and geomagnetic drivers reveals a prominent longitudinal asymmetry. In the longitudinal range from À90°to 90°, the solar illumination plays a major role, and in the range from 90°to À120°, the influence of heliospheric and geomagnetic drivers becomes significant. The highest correlations of the TEC enhancements with the heliospheric and geomagnetic drivers were found during December-February (r increased from~0.3 to~0.5). We speculate that the dynamics controlling this might result from an effect of solar zenith angle, storm time effects of thermospheric ΣO/N 2 enhancement, and penetrating electric fields of interplanetary and magnetospheric origin.Citation: Dmitriev, A.

Positive and negative GPS‐TEC ionospheric storm effects during the extreme space weather event of March 2015 over the Brazilian sector

“…On the other hand, the present investigation very clearly shows the EIA east-west differences using two chains of 10 GPS stations, each (from equator to beyond EIA crest). In Addition, different longitudinal ionospheric responses were investigated in different sectors such as American, Indian, African, and Asian [de Abreu et al, 2014;Dmitriev et al, 2013;Horvath and Lovell, 2014;Sharma et al, 2011;Sahai et al, 2009aSahai et al, , 2009b.…”

Predictable and unpredictable ionospheric disturbances during St. Patrick's Day magnetic storms of 2013 and 2015 and on 8–9 March 2008

“…During the 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm, this difference seems obvious because of the anomalous expansion of the auroral oval, which could not be predicted. Inconsistencies in prediction during the storms on 8–9 March 2008 and probably on 17–18 March 2013 could be caused by effects of day‐by‐day ionospheric variability, whose contribution to the residual values could be significant for moderate storms [e.g., Dmitriev et al ., ].…”

Impact of magnetic storms on the global TEC distribution

“…The geomagnetic storms are presented in Table 1 from the less intense (first line) to the most intense (sixth line) according to the Dst index. Gonzalez et al (1994) introduced a storm classification as follows: intense storms are characterized by Dst ≤ −100 nT, moderate storms by −100 nT ≤ Dst ≤ −50 nT and weak storms by −50 nT ≤ Dst ≤ −30 nT. According to this classification, storm no.…”