2018
DOI: 10.1080/01926187.2018.1547667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Test of Forgiveness and Perceived Forgiveness as Mediators between Religiosity and Marital Satisfaction in Long-Term Marital Relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, when examining all spousal scores (e.g., MS, RF, PO-CI, and PO-LI) as potential predictors of marital satisfaction, the only significant predictor was a husband’s religious faith on his wife’s marital satisfaction. This supported the earlier research (Rose et al, 2018) finding that husbands’ strong religious faith increased wives’ marital satisfaction. However, this study did not support the researchers’ other assertion that wives’ religious faith was predictive of lower levels of marital satisfaction in both the wife and the husband.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, when examining all spousal scores (e.g., MS, RF, PO-CI, and PO-LI) as potential predictors of marital satisfaction, the only significant predictor was a husband’s religious faith on his wife’s marital satisfaction. This supported the earlier research (Rose et al, 2018) finding that husbands’ strong religious faith increased wives’ marital satisfaction. However, this study did not support the researchers’ other assertion that wives’ religious faith was predictive of lower levels of marital satisfaction in both the wife and the husband.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Additionally, a linear regression of the spousal scores on marital satisfaction supported earlier research (Rose et al, 2018), suggesting that a husband’s strong religious faith predicted their wife’s marital satisfaction, β = 0.14, t (33) = 3.26, p = .003; this also explained 33.7% of the variance in wives’ marital satisfaction, F (4, 33) = 5.71, p < .001. However, this study did not support the finding that a wife’s religiosity was predictive of both partners’ marital satisfaction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also included a binary control for whether the respondent affiliated with any religion during W2. Because religious affiliation could be associated with religiosity, which is associated with marital satisfaction (e.g., Rose et al, 2018 ), we included religious affiliation as a control variable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the aspects of marital satisfaction that have been studied and linked to the spiritual aspect are studies conducted by Aman, Abbas, Nurunnabi, and Bano (2019) and Kasapoğlu, and Yabanigül (2018). In addition, the aspect of spirituality was also studied to understand sexuality in marriage (Hernandez-Kane, & Mahoney, 2018), religiosity in marriage (Aman et al, 2019), the relationship between spiritual well-being and marital satisfaction (Rajabi, Alimoradi, & Moradi, 2017), conflict styles, attendance in religious programs and marital satisfaction (Stinson, Bermúdez, Gale, Lewis, Meyer, & Templeton, 2017), forgiveness, perception of forgiveness and marital satisfaction over a long period of time (Rose et al, 2018), religiosity, duration of marriage, sexual satisfaction and marital satisfaction (Lazar, 2017), religious commitment and marital satisfaction (Kamomoe, Pinto, & Selvam, 2017), role of religion in marital satisfaction (Davis et al, 2018), religious commitment, forgiveness and marital satisfaction (Agu & Nwankwo, 2019), influence of religious commitment, forgiveness, and marital satisfaction (Agu & Nwankwo, 2019), spiritual intelligence, moral intelligence, marital satisfaction and social networking (Kamalju, Narimani, Atadokht, & Abolghasami, 2017) and spiritual experience, marital happiness and satisfaction (Avarandeh et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%