1965
DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(65)90127-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal studies of the natural history of caries—II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
3

Year Published

1977
1977
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
40
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of increase in %-DMFS appeared to be linear in all trajectory groups, with no apparent drop-off in the rate of increase in %-DMFS with increasing age. Thus, analysis of our data does not support the commonly held belief among dentists that childhood and adolescence are periods of special risk for dental caries, or that caries 'immunity' may be acquired during late adolescence or early adulthood (Carlos and Gittelsohn, 1965). In this population at least, new caries appears to be occurring at a relatively constant rate, implying that for greatest benefit, caries-preventive measures are necessary at all stages of the life-course.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…The rate of increase in %-DMFS appeared to be linear in all trajectory groups, with no apparent drop-off in the rate of increase in %-DMFS with increasing age. Thus, analysis of our data does not support the commonly held belief among dentists that childhood and adolescence are periods of special risk for dental caries, or that caries 'immunity' may be acquired during late adolescence or early adulthood (Carlos and Gittelsohn, 1965). In this population at least, new caries appears to be occurring at a relatively constant rate, implying that for greatest benefit, caries-preventive measures are necessary at all stages of the life-course.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…They observed that the most difficult age interval appeared to be from 8 to 10 years and they believed that the most obvious reason for that is the fact that first molars erupt around 7 years and the high risk surfaces of these teeth are soon after their emergence, and therefore very few surfaces of high risk are left after age 8 years. This novel observation contradicts that textbook information by Carlos and Gittelsohn (1965) that molar teeth (as most other teeth) are most vulnerable to caries 2-2½ years after tooth emergence, which probably is due to the heavy left-censoring of the data as discussed before.…”
Section: Survival Analysis In Practice-based Dentistrycontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The first study utilizing survival analysis methods by calibrated examiners is the classic study of Carlos and Gittelsohn (1965). Their report was based on a clinical trial of children aged 4-18 years at baseline and conducted in two towns in the state of New York, USA in the 1940's.…”
Section: Survival Analysis In Evidence-based Dentistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facts supporting the association between S. mutans and dental caries ( I) Association with disease in animals and man (2) Animal pathogenicity (3) Communicability of S. mutans and dental caries in animals and man (4) Reduction or elimination of S. mutans reduces incidence of dental caries (5) Unique combination of caries-associated biochemical characteristics Caldwell and Lehner, 1982;Lehner et al, 1985a], Thus parenteral immunization di rected to S. mutans could favour the early establishment of a non-cariogenic micro flora on the teeth, which in turn could pre vent or delay the colonization of patho genic S. mutans. As the teeth are highly susceptible to dental caries immediately after eruption [Carlos and Gittelsohn, 1965] a delay in colonization of S. mutans might be the explanation for the caries re duction in the first permanent molars which has been observed in experiments in rhesus monkeys. Fully erupted teeth would be subject to specific serum anti bodies which could influence the coloni zation of S. mutans in the so-called gingi val domain .…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Action Of a Vaccinementioning
confidence: 99%