2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Stability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
50
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Woodbury et al demonstrated that 98 percent of their 512-patient sample supported this item hierarchical structure, and this hierarchy remained stable across two time points in a 377-patient sample [29,34]. These findings strongly suggest that the keyform can be applied with confidence to the larger population of individuals with mild to moderate cortical stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Woodbury et al demonstrated that 98 percent of their 512-patient sample supported this item hierarchical structure, and this hierarchy remained stable across two time points in a 377-patient sample [29,34]. These findings strongly suggest that the keyform can be applied with confidence to the larger population of individuals with mild to moderate cortical stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Importantly, the FMA-UE item-difficulty hierarchy was consistent across 98 percent of a 512-person sample at a single time point and was invariant in a 377-person sample across two testing occasions [29,34]. These findings strongly suggest that the FMA-UE keyform can be applied to a larger population of individuals with stroke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Another common tool used in stroke rehabilitation is Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment (FMUE). FMUE, composed of scales for sensation, proprioception, joint pain, range of motion (shoulder, elbow, wrist and fingers), reflex activity and joint co-ordination and having an excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability [45,46], is one of the most comprehensive quantitative measures of motor impairment after stroke [47]. However, the FMUE components neither assess purposeful reaching tasks nor quantify the functional impairments due to spasticity or weakness [47].…”
Section: Discussion Part 1: Cimt/mcimt and Upper Limb Functional Recomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…По мнению большинства экспертов, шкала FMA-UE является хорошо продуманным, объективным и эффек-тивным методом клинического обследования больных с инсультом [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Она считается одним из наиболее точ-ных инструментов оценки нарушений двигательных функций после инсульта и используется в качестве объ-ективного показателя их ухудшения и последующего вос-становления [12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Fma-ueunclassified
“…После повторных неудачных попыток действия па-ретичной рукой пациент может перестать их предприни-мать, при этом формируется синдром приученного неис-пользования руки (англ. : learned nonuse), а связанные с верхней конечностью повседневные виды активности вы-Журнал неврологии и психиатрии, 7,2016 обзоры полняются только здоровой рукой [3]. Будучи исключен-ной из движения, паретичная рука не имеет перспектив двигательного восстановления, поскольку феномен неу-потребления приводит к торможению зон мозга, ответ-ственных за работу верхней конечности.…”
unclassified