2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal relationships between language and verbal short-term memory skills in children with Down syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study align with earlier longitudinal studies that have found increasing receptive vocabulary in the childhood period for children with DS (Kay‐Raining Bird et al, ; Næss et al, ). Cross‐sectional studies in adulthood have generally indicated a decrease in receptive vocabulary with age (Carter‐Young & Kramer, ; Cooper & Collacot, 1995) as found in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of this study align with earlier longitudinal studies that have found increasing receptive vocabulary in the childhood period for children with DS (Kay‐Raining Bird et al, ; Næss et al, ). Cross‐sectional studies in adulthood have generally indicated a decrease in receptive vocabulary with age (Carter‐Young & Kramer, ; Cooper & Collacot, 1995) as found in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Næss, Lervåg, Lyster, and Hulme () used the Norwegian version of the PPVT (Lyster et al, ) to measure receptive vocabulary in 57 typically developing children and in 43 children with DS, matched on nonverbal ability. At the beginning of the study, the children with DS were 6 years of age while the children in the typically developing group had a mean CA of 3 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DS group did perform better on visual task with additional spatial support. Costanzo 2013 [ 90 ] WS group NVMA-matched TD Leiter-Revised or SB (1 child matched with SB, all others matched on Leiter-R) M=14.5 (Range=8-21) M=6.2 Verbal & Spatial STM Digit Span Recall Nonword Repetition Corsi Span Task DS < WS & TD-NVMA DS < WS & TD- NVMA DS & WS < TD- NVMA; DS ~ WS Carney 2013 [ 92 ] WS group TD participants with similar MA SB Abbreviated Battery M=14.5 (Range=10-21) M=6.0 Verbal & Spatial STM Word List Recall Block Recall DS~WS~TD DS ~ TD; DS & TD> WS DS Group– Visuospatial > Verbal Carretti 2013 [ 94 ] VMA-matched TD PPVT-Revised M=14.17 (Range=9-17) M=5.17 Spatial STM Spatial-Sequential Test Spatial-Simultaneous Test DS ~ TD-VMA DS < TD-VMA Lanfranchi 2014 [93] MA-matched TD Logical Operations Test M=15.66 (SD=3.08) M=5.75 Visual STM Picture Span Recall DS < TD-MA Naess 2015 [ 85 ] NVMA-matched TD WPPSI Block Design M=6.32 (Range=5-6) -- Verbal STM Sentence Memory Nonword Repetition DS < TD-NVMA DS < TD- NVMA Lanfranchi 2015 [ 184 ] MA-matched TD PPVT-Revised RCM M=14.17 (Range=9-17) M=5.17 Spatial STM Patterned Spatial Recall Random Spatial Recall DS < TD-MA DS ~ TD-MA Loveall 2016 [ 185 ] TD & ID with similar NVMA (measured with the Leiter-R) M=14.91 M=5.35 Verbal STM Nonword repetition DS < TD-NVMA & ID group ...…”
Section: Literature Review and Analytic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mosse and Jarrold (2011) observed that novel word learning abilities can be preserved in children and adults with DS, despite the existence of severe verbal STM limitations. In the same vein, Naess et al (2015) did not observe any specific longitudinal relationship between verbal STM measures and later vocabulary knowledge in children with DS, after controlling for initial vocabulary knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…At the same time, our findings may not be specific to DS, given that the same argumentation can also be applied to the large set of studies that have investigated the association between receptive vocabulary development and verbal STM in typically developing populations, as these studies also used the PPVT/EVIP multi-picture vocabulary task (e.g. Gathercole et al 1992;Naess et al 2015;Majerus et al 2006;Leclercq & Majerus 2010). For typically developing populations, studies exploring STM/vocabulary associations with productive vocabulary tasks that have no intrinsic STM load are lacking and need urgently need to be conducted; existing studies exploring the role of STM in productive lexical measures used novel word learning tasks that also have an intrinsic STM load (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%