1977
DOI: 10.1109/tns.1977.4328957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Phenomena in the CERN SPS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was conjectured as early as 1976 [1] that the large number of discontinuities in the machine vacuum chamber could be the cause of the microwave instability responsible for blow-up during the debunching and recapture process at 10 GeV in the SPS. The problem was solved at that time by installing a 200 MHz RF bunching system in the PS (the SPS injector) and injecting bunch into bucket.…”
Section: What Type Of Problems Do We Expect?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was conjectured as early as 1976 [1] that the large number of discontinuities in the machine vacuum chamber could be the cause of the microwave instability responsible for blow-up during the debunching and recapture process at 10 GeV in the SPS. The problem was solved at that time by installing a 200 MHz RF bunching system in the PS (the SPS injector) and injecting bunch into bucket.…”
Section: What Type Of Problems Do We Expect?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here are a few examples. Already in the first two years of operation the impedance of two higher order modes, one transverse at 460 MHz and the other longitudinal at 628 MHz [1] in the main RF cavities, were identified as causing instability and intensity limitation and had to be passively damped. When preparing for SppS, bunch intensities were limited when crossing transition by both a longitudinal negative mass instability and a transverse head-tail instability to 2 × 10 10 protons [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the beam of 243 bunches, intensity 10 11 per bunch, filling 3/11 of the machine circumference, combines the high single bunch intensities obtained during collider operation in the past, where the microwave instability was a limitation [3], with the large total intensities achieved in fixed target operation, where coupled bunch instabilities are seen. The microwave instability, first observed in the SPS in 1976 [4], is not harmful for present operation, but it limits the single bunch intensity of the LHC beam. A new measurement technique [5], used last year and described below, has allowed us to determine the dominant sources of longitudinal impedance in the SPS responsible for this instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the SPS this method has already been applied in the past with the proton fixed target beam of 5 ns bunch spacing and 4 10 8 protons per bunch [10]. LHC type beams have 25 ns bunch spacing and intensities of 10 11 protons per bunch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every bunch is exposed to a different rf voltage and has therefore its own synchrotron frequency. In [10] the rf amplitude was modulated sinusoidal whereas we applied a linear rf amplitude change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%