2017
DOI: 10.1017/pan.2017.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Network Centrality Using Incomplete Data

Abstract: How do individuals’ influence in a large social network change? Social scientists have difficulty answering this question because measuring influence requires frequent observations of a population of individuals’ connections to each other, while sampling that social network removes information in a way that can bias inferences. This paper introduces a method to measure influence over time accurately from sampled network data. Ranking individuals by the sum of their connections’ connections—neighbor cumulative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because Twitter returns following lists in reverse chronological order, we can infer when an account started following another account (Steinert-Threlkeld, 2017). For the accounts in the six categories, we compare the increase in followers from mainland China to the increase in followers from Hong Kong accounts relative to their December 2019 baselines.…”
Section: What Types Of Twitter Accounts Did Mainland Twitter Users Start To Follow As a Results Of The Crisis?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because Twitter returns following lists in reverse chronological order, we can infer when an account started following another account (Steinert-Threlkeld, 2017). For the accounts in the six categories, we compare the increase in followers from mainland China to the increase in followers from Hong Kong accounts relative to their December 2019 baselines.…”
Section: What Types Of Twitter Accounts Did Mainland Twitter Users Start To Follow As a Results Of The Crisis?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of collecting data on more protests, an alternative is to collect data about social networks before and during a protest. [ 14 ] uses ties within a social movement to estimate the probability that individuals cease participation; [ 12 ] shows protest information has differential effects depending on the degree centrality of its source, and [ 87 ] shows how to measure daily changes in online network structure; and [ 30 ] uses school attendance records to show how local network participation affects individuals’ decision to protest. With more detailed data on a society’s underlying network, the extent to which networks condition repression’s effect may become clearer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We downloaded the profile information of all accounts that began following these popular accounts after 1 November 2019. Because Twitter returns follower lists in reverse chronological order, we can infer when an account started following another account ( 46 ). We then use the location field to identify which of these 38,050,454 followers are from mainland China or Hong Kong (see SI Appendix , section 2 for more details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because Twitter returns follower lists in reverse chronological order, we can infer when an account started following another account ( 46 ). For the accounts in the six categories, we compare the increase in followers from mainland China to the increase in followers from Hong Kong accounts relative to their December 2019 baselines; we chose Hong Kong because it is part of the People’s Republic of China but is not affected by the Firewall.…”
Section: The Effect Of Crisis On Information Seeking and Censorship Circumventionmentioning
confidence: 99%