1994
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.44.7.1287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal monitoring of the levodopa concentration‐effect relationship in Parkinson's disease

Abstract: We prospectively evaluated over 4 years the intrasubject relationship between levodopa plasma concentration and the tapping effect after a standard oral levodopa test in 28 patients with mild-to-moderate idiopathic Parkinson's disease. The onset and duration of the tapping effect significantly shortened over years; response amplitude did not vary. Levodopa plasma kinetics remained unchanged. Pharmacodynamic modeling indicated a progressive decrease in the equilibration half-life between plasma drug concentrati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
46
4
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
46
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In these subjects, levodopa concentrations peaked near the end of the loading dose of levodopa and then stabilized approximately 30 min later [16]. Furthermore, mean levodopa levels remained above levels known to have an antiparkinsonian effect [23] during collection of the on-levodopa fMRI scans. There were no significant differences between groups in levodopa levels at the time of the post-levodopa scans (TD mean=502.8 ng/ml, SD=79.8; C mean=494.8 ng/ml, SD=73.1).…”
Section: Levodopa and Carbidopa Plasma Levelsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In these subjects, levodopa concentrations peaked near the end of the loading dose of levodopa and then stabilized approximately 30 min later [16]. Furthermore, mean levodopa levels remained above levels known to have an antiparkinsonian effect [23] during collection of the on-levodopa fMRI scans. There were no significant differences between groups in levodopa levels at the time of the post-levodopa scans (TD mean=502.8 ng/ml, SD=79.8; C mean=494.8 ng/ml, SD=73.1).…”
Section: Levodopa and Carbidopa Plasma Levelsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The magnitude of clinical response to levodopa was the same for patients with the wearing-off phenomenon, and dopamine agonists have been shown to improve this predictable motor fluctuation [2]. These observations suggest intact D2 receptor densities in patients with the wearing-off phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peripheral levodopa pharmacokinetics has been shown to be less important in the pathogenesis of motor fluctuation [2]. Both presynaptic [3, 4] and postsynaptic [5, 6] mechanisms have been reported to be important in the development of motor fluctuation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many years, the development of wearing-off has been mainly attributed to a shortening of the SDR over time [13,14] as a result of the progressive reduction in the ability of the nigrostriatal neurons to synthesize and to store dopamine formed from exogenous levodopa [15,16]. However, a number of studies have shown that the magnitude of the SDR and modifications of the LDR during the course of PD also have a critical role in the development of symptom re-emergence [17].…”
Section: Clinical Features Of Wearing-off: the Short- And Long-duratimentioning
confidence: 99%