2006
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Mapping of Cortical Thickness and Clinical Outcome in Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Abstract: Children with ADHD show relative cortical thinning in regions important for attentional control. Children with a worse outcome have "fixed" thinning of the left medial prefrontal cortex, which may compromise the anterior attentional network and encumber clinical improvement. Right parietal cortex thickness normalization in patients with a better outcome may represent compensatory cortical change.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

40
440
3
17

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 602 publications
(500 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
40
440
3
17
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we had follow-up information on a large proportion of the ADHD sample (n ¼ 107) and had DNA on 69 of these 107. We categorized the follow-up sample as having ''good'' or ''poor'' outcome based on a median split of scores at follow-up on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) [Shaffer et al, 1983;Shaw et al, 2006]. There was a higher frequency of the 7-repeat allele in the good outcome group as compared to the poor outcome group (28% vs. 18%, respectively), though this difference did not reach statistical significance, likely due to the small sample size (P ¼ 0.11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we had follow-up information on a large proportion of the ADHD sample (n ¼ 107) and had DNA on 69 of these 107. We categorized the follow-up sample as having ''good'' or ''poor'' outcome based on a median split of scores at follow-up on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) [Shaffer et al, 1983;Shaw et al, 2006]. There was a higher frequency of the 7-repeat allele in the good outcome group as compared to the poor outcome group (28% vs. 18%, respectively), though this difference did not reach statistical significance, likely due to the small sample size (P ¼ 0.11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixed effect models, which would have been the gold standard technique to combine cross-sectional and longitudinal data, commonly encompass more than 500 scans (Shaw et al, 2006a(Shaw et al, , 2006b(Shaw et al, , 2007a(Shaw et al, , 2007b(Shaw et al, , 2008 or 3-4 time-points Greenstein et al, 2006). Given the limited size of our sample, we preferred the use of repeated-measures at each cortical vertex, to identify significant differences in thickness changes over the 3 year period.…”
Section: Longitudinal Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, cortical thickness studies have an exquisite resolution, allowing for the identification of local alterations with high precision. Consequently, a growing amount of studies apply thickness measurement as an index of development in patients with various conditions, such as attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Shaw et al, 2007a(Shaw et al, , 2006b, autism (Chung et al, 2005;Hadjikhani et al, 2007;Hardan et al, 2006), or schizophrenia Greenstein et al, 2006;Kuperberg et al, 2003). In 22q11DS, previous studies by Bearden and colleagues in 21 affected children and adolescents compared to 13 controls reported thinner superior parietal, right parieto-occipital and ventro-medial occipito-temporal cortices (Bearden et al, 2007;Bearden et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre-SMA area is connected to the anterior prefrontal areas (Dum and Strick 1991) and striatal projections from the pre-SMA largely extend to the caudate nucleus and the middle and rostral putamen (Lehericy et al 2004). Anatomic imaging studies of children with ADHD reported localized anomalies in pre-SMA area, including reduced volume (Mostofsky et al 2002) and thickness when compared with control children (Shaw et al 2006). This area plays an important role in motor planning and switching from automatic to voluntary controlled actions (Hoshi and Tanji 2004).…”
Section: Role Of Cerebral Cortex In Inhibitory Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%