2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal factorial invariance of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Determining the nature of method effects due to item wording

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
24
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
8
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Weijters, Geuens, and Schillewaert (2010b) analyzed data of 604 respondents with latent state-trait models and reported that 60% of acquiescence variance is stable over one year. Similarly, other authors have considered the response bias associated with wording effects as wording method factors and also find relatively high stability of these factors, for instance, in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Gana et al, 2013;Marsh, Scalas, & Nagengast, 2010;Motl & DiStefano, 2002). These results do suggest that a substantial proportion of acquiescence is stable over time.…”
Section: Stability Of Acquiescencesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In addition, Weijters, Geuens, and Schillewaert (2010b) analyzed data of 604 respondents with latent state-trait models and reported that 60% of acquiescence variance is stable over one year. Similarly, other authors have considered the response bias associated with wording effects as wording method factors and also find relatively high stability of these factors, for instance, in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Gana et al, 2013;Marsh, Scalas, & Nagengast, 2010;Motl & DiStefano, 2002). These results do suggest that a substantial proportion of acquiescence is stable over time.…”
Section: Stability Of Acquiescencesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Similar to Gana et al's () studies, eight measurement models of the RSES were evaluated (Figure ). Model 1 posited a global self‐esteem factor, while Model 2 posited two oblique factors, positive and negative self‐esteem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent longitudinal studies support the latter view; models incorporating both positive and negative method effects consistently show the best fit to data across time (Gana et al, ; Marsh et al, ; Motl & DiStefano, ). Moreover, method effects in the RSES are related to important personality constructs (DiStefano & Motl, ; Lindwall et al, ; Quilty et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Self-esteem is a general attitude towards oneself and it is assumed to be a positive or negative orientation toward oneself (Gana et al, 2013). Self-esteem is a stronger determinant of educational attainment for males than females (de Araujo & Lagos, 2012).…”
Section: Self-esteemmentioning
confidence: 99%