2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1105403108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal evidence that fatherhood decreases testosterone in human males

Abstract: In species in which males care for young, testosterone (T) is often high during mating periods but then declines to allow for caregiving of resulting offspring. This model may apply to human males, but past human studies of T and fatherhood have been cross-sectional, making it unclear whether fatherhood suppresses T or if men with lower T are more likely to become fathers. Here, we use a large representative study in the Philippines (n = 624) to show that among single nonfathers at baseline (2005) (21.5 ± 0.3 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
381
6
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 423 publications
(424 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
31
381
6
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous findings also show that T can fortify traits associated with attractiveness and mating effort, such as the pursuit of status/social dominance (e.g., Archer, 2006) or the motivation to win a competition (Salvador, Suay, González-Bono, & Serrano, 2003). Other research examining paired (i.e., in committed and/or romantic relationships) versus non-paired (i.e., not in a committed relationship) men show differences in T levels in this predicted direction such that paired men have lower T; such findings have been shown repeatedly across both cross-sectional and longitudinal study designs (Burnham et al, 2003;Gettler, McDade, Feranil, & Kuzawa, 2011;Gray et al, 2004;Gray, Yang, & Pope, 2006). Because pair-bonding reduces the need to compete for mates, lower T levels may be a consequence, or alternatively, high T-levels may help facilitate mating for the most desirable mates.…”
Section: Testosteronementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Previous findings also show that T can fortify traits associated with attractiveness and mating effort, such as the pursuit of status/social dominance (e.g., Archer, 2006) or the motivation to win a competition (Salvador, Suay, González-Bono, & Serrano, 2003). Other research examining paired (i.e., in committed and/or romantic relationships) versus non-paired (i.e., not in a committed relationship) men show differences in T levels in this predicted direction such that paired men have lower T; such findings have been shown repeatedly across both cross-sectional and longitudinal study designs (Burnham et al, 2003;Gettler, McDade, Feranil, & Kuzawa, 2011;Gray et al, 2004;Gray, Yang, & Pope, 2006). Because pair-bonding reduces the need to compete for mates, lower T levels may be a consequence, or alternatively, high T-levels may help facilitate mating for the most desirable mates.…”
Section: Testosteronementioning
confidence: 89%
“…A study of Hadza foragers found that men increase their production of less-widely shared foods when they have newborns in camp (59). In many societies, fatherhood is associated with a decrease in testosterone level (60). The change in testosterone may facilitate a shift not away from status seeking, but rather away from aspects of status seeking that focus on mate access and toward aspects of status seeking that focus on social network building (61).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the in fl uence of hormones like prolactin, vasopressin, oxytocin, and testosterone in relation to bonding and infant care, or behavioral trade-offs between care and mate-acquisition have been extensively studied, even if still not completely understood (Bales et al 2004 ;Brockmann et al 2001 ;Gettler et al 2011 ;Goymann et al 2007 ;Gray et al 2007 ;Hirschenhauser and Oliveira 2006 ;Huck et al 2005 ;Schradin and Anzenberger 2002 ;Schradin et al 2003 ;Trainor andMarler 2001, 2002 ;Wing fi eld et al 1990 ;Ziegler 2000 ;Ziegler et al 1996Ziegler et al , 2000 . Differences in hormone production, responsiveness, or ontogenetic exposure may partly explain individual differences in caretaking behavior (Birnie et al 2011 ;Drea 2007 ;Ziegler et al 2009 ) .…”
Section: Proximate Perspectives Of Parental Carementioning
confidence: 99%