2015
DOI: 10.1127/fal/2015/0769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal distributional patterns of Peracarida (Crustacea, Malacostraca) in the River Danube

Abstract: 30The River Danube plays a central role in the spread of Ponto-Caspian species as a part of the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some more recent studies of the macroinvertebrate communities of Croatian and Serbian section of Danube failed to detect its presence in the Danube (Paunović et al 2007), while other studies report its presence in the Serbian part of Danube (Paunović et al, 2010). However, in the most recent study Borza et al (2015) reported findings of the species in the Croatian section of the Danube. Based on these and our data we assume that E. ischnus was more abundant in the Danube in the past, while now has low abundance and it is therefore difficult to detect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, some more recent studies of the macroinvertebrate communities of Croatian and Serbian section of Danube failed to detect its presence in the Danube (Paunović et al 2007), while other studies report its presence in the Serbian part of Danube (Paunović et al, 2010). However, in the most recent study Borza et al (2015) reported findings of the species in the Croatian section of the Danube. Based on these and our data we assume that E. ischnus was more abundant in the Danube in the past, while now has low abundance and it is therefore difficult to detect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Based on these and our data we assume that E. ischnus was more abundant in the Danube in the past, while now has low abundance and it is therefore difficult to detect. It is possible that Dikerogammarus villosus and Chelicorophium curvispinum, which are now the dominant amphipods in the Danube (Žganec et al, 2009;Borza et al, 2015), have caused the decline of E. ischnus. The decline of E. ischnus observed in the lower Rhine was probably facilitated by the mass abundance of C. curvispinum, which probably reduced the colonization success of E. ischnus, a lithophilic dweller, by covering the solid substrates in the river with mud tubes (Bij De Vaate et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mysids were excluded, as their habitat use markedly differs from that of D. villosus (epibenthic or semi‐pelagic). In addition, they mostly reach high abundances in semi‐enclosed inlets and slow‐flowing sidearms, so they were found only sporadically during the survey (Borza et al, ). The filter feeding, tube‐dwelling corophiids were excluded, too, as the data suggest that their abundance is primarily determined by the quality and quantity of suspended matter, rather than by habitat characteristics (Borza, Huber, Leitner, Remund, & Graf, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species locally eliminated by D. villosus are all native to Europe (e.g. Gammarus spp., Asellus aquaticus (Linnaeus, 1758); Borza et al, ; Dick & Platvoet, ) or are North American invaders to Europe (e.g. Gammarus tigrinus Sexton, 1939; Dick & Platvoet, ; Leuven et al, ); nevertheless, some species were able to persist in the invaded waters by switching habitats (Hesselschwerdt, Necker, & Wantzen, ; Platvoet, Dick, MacNeil, van Riel, & van der Velde, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The severe ecological impacts of alien species dispersal in the Danube River was already elucidated by the Joint Danube Survey 2 (ICPDR, ), as among the 10 most frequent macroinvertebrate species, nine are considered as alien (Graf et al, ). The Joint Danube Survey 3 (ICPDR, ) confirmed these findings (Borza et al, ). Benthic assemblages of the Danube River are nowadays dominated by nonindigenous, invasive, or cosmopolitan species (Graf, Csányi, et al, ; Graf, Leitner, & Pletterbauer, ).…”
Section: Dispersal Of Alien Species In Relation To the Historic Develmentioning
confidence: 99%