Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1101/099457
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal differential abundance analysis of microbial marker-gene surveys using smoothing splines

Abstract: BackgroundHigh-throughput targeted sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA marker gene is often used to profile and characterize the taxonomic composition of microbial communities. This type of big high-through sequencing data is rapidly being applied to various infectious diseases like diarrhea. While many studies are limited to single "snapshots" of these communities, there is increasing recognition that longitudinal profiling of these communities are required to understand community dynamics and the complex rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We summarized the results for OTUs with an absolute fold change of >1.5 and FDR adjusted p-value <0.025 in either age strata. We picked eight representative OTUs to more precisely investigate how the associations changed over time, and modelled the longitudinal structure of the data using smoothing splines ANOVA with 100 permutations to assess significance ( Paulson et al., 2017 ). All models for the ARI vs. healthy association were adjusted for age, season, gender, and any antibiotics within the last 4 weeks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We summarized the results for OTUs with an absolute fold change of >1.5 and FDR adjusted p-value <0.025 in either age strata. We picked eight representative OTUs to more precisely investigate how the associations changed over time, and modelled the longitudinal structure of the data using smoothing splines ANOVA with 100 permutations to assess significance ( Paulson et al., 2017 ). All models for the ARI vs. healthy association were adjusted for age, season, gender, and any antibiotics within the last 4 weeks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to test taxonomic differential abundances, the family aggregated data were normalized by cumulative sum scaling approach and analysed in metagenomeSeq package [21], the effect of genotype was tested with the procedure for longitudinal data “fitTimeseries”[22] and the “fit-zig model” implemented in the same package was used for the other pairwise contrast.The level of significance was defined by p values (P) <0.05. For multiple comparisons the Benjamini& Hochberg correction was applied (Padjust).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the slope ̂ assumes underlying log-linear growth, the eGaIT statistic ̂ assumes only a smooth response over the study period. Though the eGaIT estimates ̂ are scaled so as to align well with their group-matched LMM slope estimates ̂ in the log linear case, they are area under the curve (AUC) statistics (44): an alternative interpretation of the eGaIT statistic is as the constant log-linear growth rate that would have been needed to yield the AUC that we actually observed (see appendix). This interpretation gives some intuition as to when summarizing longitudinal curves by eGaIT is likely to enhance power to discriminate among treatment effects.…”
Section: Comparing Slope and Egaitmentioning
confidence: 99%