2014
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2014.58103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Data on the Relations of Morphological and Phonological Training to Reading Acquisition in First Grade: The Case of Arabic Language

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the development of morphological and phonological awareness and their impact on later reading skills. Two training programs (morphological and phonological awareness) were conducted in kindergarten and were compared to no-intervention control group. Phonological and morphological tests and other general abilities were measured for 90 children at kindergarten as pre and post intervention tests. Tests in reading and spelling were carried out at the middle of grade 1. Resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More particularly, our results show that phonological intervention improved phonological processing of blending and decoding, in line with previous results (Fälth, Idor, & Tomas, 2011;Lyster, 2002), including Arabic-based studies (Dallasheh-Khatib et al, 2014), indicating that the blending of phonemes, besides other subskills, are strong predictors of future reading success.…”
Section: Discussion the Effects Of Phonological Training On Reading Wsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More particularly, our results show that phonological intervention improved phonological processing of blending and decoding, in line with previous results (Fälth, Idor, & Tomas, 2011;Lyster, 2002), including Arabic-based studies (Dallasheh-Khatib et al, 2014), indicating that the blending of phonemes, besides other subskills, are strong predictors of future reading success.…”
Section: Discussion the Effects Of Phonological Training On Reading Wsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Unlike previous Arabic studies (Dallasheh-Khatib, Ibrahim, & Karni, 2014;Taha, 2013;Tibi, 2010), the present one focused on investigating the effects of PA intervention on dyslexics and normal readers from grades 4 and 5 at pre-training and post-training periods. Both groups were exposed to a similar reading condition in the classroom.…”
Section: Design and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this combined phonological and print training, the explicit practice of grapheme-phoneme association and the segmentation of words into syllables were taught repeatedly. Positive effects of the intervention program replicate previous investigations in Swedish (Fälth, Idor, & Tomas, 2011), English (Snowling &Hulme, 2011), andArabic (Dallasheh-Khatib, Ibrahim, &Karni, 2014), demonstrating that acquired awareness of word structure is related to reading performance across languages. Likewise, in numerous studies on kindergarten children, blending and segmenting activities improved the skills of children with low PA on PA tasks and on a reading task (O'Connor, Jenkins, & Slocum, 1995;Torgesen, Morgan, & Davis, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This transition may make more complicated the process of establishing precise phonological representations in readingdisabled children, hindering grapheme to phoneme conversion. The most potent effect occurred for PA assessed by the blending phoneme test, as in previous investigations (Fälth, Idor, & Tomas, 2011;Lyster, 2002;Snowling & Hulme, 2011;Torgeson, 2006), including Arabic (Dallasheh-Khatib et al, 2014), demonstrating that awareness of word structure is related to reading acquisition across languages. This finding provides additional evidence that phonological intervention may apply qualitative changes on the underlying phonological representations which, in turn, make phonological processing processes more efficient.…”
Section: Effects Of Phonological Training On Phonological Processingsupporting
confidence: 81%