2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal compression failure of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites: An experimental and computational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many authors found that process-induced defects, such as high void content, poor interlayer bonding and inhomogeneous fibers distribution, has a high impact on interlaminar shear strength and failure behavior of the printed objects [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. However, a remarkable improvement in the mechanical properties has been reported for various load cases: tension [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22 ], compression [ 18 , 20 , 23 , 24 ], bending [ 24 , 25 , 26 ], fatigue [ 27 ], creep [ 27 ] and impact [ 28 ]. The effect of build orientation, fiber content and infill pattern (i.e., isotropic or concentric fiber orientation inside a single layer) on the mechanical behavior of the 3D printed composites was also studied [ 15 , 21 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors found that process-induced defects, such as high void content, poor interlayer bonding and inhomogeneous fibers distribution, has a high impact on interlaminar shear strength and failure behavior of the printed objects [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. However, a remarkable improvement in the mechanical properties has been reported for various load cases: tension [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22 ], compression [ 18 , 20 , 23 , 24 ], bending [ 24 , 25 , 26 ], fatigue [ 27 ], creep [ 27 ] and impact [ 28 ]. The effect of build orientation, fiber content and infill pattern (i.e., isotropic or concentric fiber orientation inside a single layer) on the mechanical behavior of the 3D printed composites was also studied [ 15 , 21 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to conventional composite materials (2.5–3.7%, 28 0.02–3.75% 29 ), these values are significantly larger and can negatively influence mechanical properties. Tang et al 30 showed that an initial fiber misalignment angle of 7° in predicting the longitudinal compressive strength of unidirectional materials agreed with experimental values. They also mentioned that the initial misalignment angle was greater than that of conventional composite materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…29,30 These unanticipated alterations in fiber morphology were shown to diminish the mechanical properties of composites. [31][32][33][34] Different measurement techniques were developed to regulate fiber tension, thereby advancing the production of high-performance 3D composite preforms. [35][36][37][38][39] The FO3DWP technology uses the Guide Bar Array (GBA) as yarn nodes to ensure the structural integrity of 3D woven preforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%