2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal changes over thirty-six months in postural control dynamics and cognitive function in people with Parkinson's disease

Abstract: People with PD exhibit decreased regularity of trunk dynamics when standing compared to HOAs. Nonlinear accelerometer metrics along all three axes are therefore a potential biomarker of PD. The relationship between trunk dynamics and cognitive function indicates common neural pathways.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is supported by a study that reported decreased AP sway during standing in people with PD compared to controls (50). A recent study analyzing postural data from a similar cohort of individuals with PD observed increased regularity of postural dynamics from 18 to 54 months along the AP axis suggesting possible modification of motor control along this axis (56). The reduction in AP postural dynamics may result from greater instability in the AP direction, associated with decreased knee flexion and greater difficulty initiating ankle dorsiflexion to maintain balance (57).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is supported by a study that reported decreased AP sway during standing in people with PD compared to controls (50). A recent study analyzing postural data from a similar cohort of individuals with PD observed increased regularity of postural dynamics from 18 to 54 months along the AP axis suggesting possible modification of motor control along this axis (56). The reduction in AP postural dynamics may result from greater instability in the AP direction, associated with decreased knee flexion and greater difficulty initiating ankle dorsiflexion to maintain balance (57).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear parameters and derived indexes provide information about the direction (e.g., anterior–posterior or mediolateral directions) and global ‘magnitude’ of postural sway (e.g., root mean square (RMS), limits of stability, jerk, ellipsis), and the fluctuation of COM or COP displacement (frequency domain metrics) [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Non-linear outcomes describe the regularity or predictability of balance control [53].…”
Section: Section I: Quantitative Movement Analysis: From Measuremementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocols that are used to assess postural control vary greatly from quiet standing to standing barefoot or with shoes on, on a foam support or firm surface, with eyes open or closed (Romberg test), with either standardised or unrestricted foot placement, with arms across the chest or by their sides, and over different trial durations ranging from 30 to 120 seconds [48,51,53,54,55,56]. To date, postural control outcomes are typically summarised over the test duration, which may limit comparability across protocols of varied duration, as most linear metrics are time-dependent and thus influenced by test duration.…”
Section: Section I: Quantitative Movement Analysis: From Measuremementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These instrumented tests provide an array of quantitative features that can distinguish specific characteristics of motor function in individuals with PD [ 18 , 25 29 ]. Similarly, studies have used accelerometry (ACC) to analyse postural control in individuals with PD [ 30 32 ], and to investigate differences in features of the gait cycle between PD and healthy control subjects, such as step time, swing time and stride time [ 27 , 28 , 33 , 34 ]. While these studies highlight the advantages of instrumenting clinical tests to examine patient mobility, there remains a dearth of research incorporating body-worn sensors to monitor and quantitatively assess adaptations in motor function occurring at various stages of physical therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%