2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.03.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Changes of Angle Configuration in Primary Angle-Closure Suspects

Abstract: Objective-To determine longitudinal changes in angle configuration in the eyes of primary angle-closure suspects (PACS) treated by laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) and in untreated fellow eyes. Design-Longitudinal cohort study.Participants-Primary angle-closure suspects aged 50 to 70 years were enrolled in a randomized, controlled clinical trial.Methods-Each participant was treated by LPI in 1 randomly selected eye, with the fellow eye serving as a control. Angle width was assessed in a masked fashion using go… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
41
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(31 reference statements)
9
41
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, aging substantially affects AS parameters, with increased LV, decreased ACD, and increased IC noted with age. 27,33 In previous studies, parameters such as AOD, LV, and IT 750 were substantially different when measured at 2 weeks and at 18 months post-LPI, 19,34 showing progressive change of AS features with time in PAC eyes underwent LPI.However, when we assessed the baseline factors which may predict the long-term outcome of LPI, greater AOD 750 and thicker IT were consistently associated with poor outcome. Recently, Han et al investigated the effect of LPI in subgroups of angle closure eyes based on AS OCTderived parameters and showed proportional change in AOD 750 after LPI was significantly greater in eyes with less AOD 750 at baseline, which supported the outcome of current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In fact, aging substantially affects AS parameters, with increased LV, decreased ACD, and increased IC noted with age. 27,33 In previous studies, parameters such as AOD, LV, and IT 750 were substantially different when measured at 2 weeks and at 18 months post-LPI, 19,34 showing progressive change of AS features with time in PAC eyes underwent LPI.However, when we assessed the baseline factors which may predict the long-term outcome of LPI, greater AOD 750 and thicker IT were consistently associated with poor outcome. Recently, Han et al investigated the effect of LPI in subgroups of angle closure eyes based on AS OCTderived parameters and showed proportional change in AOD 750 after LPI was significantly greater in eyes with less AOD 750 at baseline, which supported the outcome of current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Other studies have demonstrated progressive narrowing in patients who have had LPI with extended follow-up. 12, 23 Although statistically significant deepening did occur with LPI over the course of this study, the threshold of clinically significant angle deepening is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Previous studies have evaluated the changes in anterior chamber angle anatomy after LPI using gonioscopy, 8 ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), 9, 10 and time domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography (TD-ASOCT; Visante, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA). 11, 12 Clinically, gonioscopy can be used to visualize the angle structures qualitatively, but it is a challenging exam. Quantifying angle measurements or changes in those measurements is unreliable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the initial report on the natural history of PACS, angle width of treated eyes increased following LPI and remained stable for 6 months, then showed significant decrease in 18 months. At the present point of time LPI has not shown any great advantage over observation for PACS 19. The Asia Pacific Guidelines for glaucoma do not recommend LPI for all PACS mainly because the natural history of PACS is not well known 20.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%