2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11682-012-9161-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal change in neuropsychological performance using latent growth models: a study of mild cognitive impairment

Abstract: The goal of the current study was to examine cognitive change in both healthy controls (n=229) and individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (n=397) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). We applied latent growth modeling to examine baseline and longitudinal change over 36 months in five cognitive factors derived from the ADNI neuropsychological test battery (memory, executive function/processing speed, language, attention and visuospatial). At baseline, MCI patients demonstrated l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
56
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
9
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with evidence that individuals with MCI experience changes in cognitive areas beyond memory (Aretouli & Brandt, 2010;Brandt et al, 2009;Clark et al, 2012;Johns et al, 2012;Johnson, 2012;Schmitter-Edgecombe & Sanders, 2009;Tabert et al, 2006;Yanhong et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2007), our findings revealed that MCI participants performed more poorly than OAs on several standardized measures of executive functioning (Trails B, D-KEFS Letter Fluency and Design Fluency). However, correlational analyses revealed no significant associations between the Amap measures and these standardized measures of executive function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Consistent with evidence that individuals with MCI experience changes in cognitive areas beyond memory (Aretouli & Brandt, 2010;Brandt et al, 2009;Clark et al, 2012;Johns et al, 2012;Johnson, 2012;Schmitter-Edgecombe & Sanders, 2009;Tabert et al, 2006;Yanhong et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2007), our findings revealed that MCI participants performed more poorly than OAs on several standardized measures of executive functioning (Trails B, D-KEFS Letter Fluency and Design Fluency). However, correlational analyses revealed no significant associations between the Amap measures and these standardized measures of executive function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition to GEE methods using factor scores, we estimated the association of diabetes with cognitive decline simultaneously with the factor analysis in a structural equations model specifying a latent growth curve across the factors (Supplemental Figure 1)(37). In another sensitivity analysis, we compared associations between diabetes and general cognitive performance based on all available tests to associations based on a model using only the three tests administered at all study visits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scaling approach does not make the WHICAP sample nationally representative, but it allows future analysts, using other datasets with items overlapping with ADAMS, to derive directly comparable scores. This approach assumes measurement invariance of factors with respect to time: an assumption previously verified in other samples of older adults and which we evaluated in WHICAP through formal tests described earlier (Hayden et al, 2011; Johnson et al, 2012). We additionally tested longitudinal measurement invariance of the factors among participants assessed at baseline and whose second study visit was between 1.5 and 2.5 years later (median: 2.1 years) using multiple group confirmatory factor analysis models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test hypotheses, we used multilevel models with random effects for people and time alongside fixed effects for retest in general cognition, memory, executive functioning, and language (Johnson et al, 2012; Laird & Ware, 1982; Muthen et al, 1997; Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002). Time since enrollment into the study was the timescale of interest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%