2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal associations between MRI and cognitive changes in very early MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrasts findings in MS cohorts with a wider spectrum of disability in which a relation of SDMT to whole brain measures (brain volume, T2 lesion volume) was evident (63), while evidence of such relationship in patients with early relapsing-remitting MS or CIS is sparse (63, 64). Consistent with our findings, more recent studies in early RRMS or CIS cohorts (32, 65, 66) were unable to confirm correlations of SDMT performance with volumetric brain measures while Bisecco et al have reported on thalamic atrophy as an independent and additional contributor to SDMT variance in a cross-sectional analysis controlled for sex and age of 125 RRMS patients (mean age 37 years, median EDSS 2) (67). However, they used a different analytic approach (voxel-based morphometry analysis) and the MS group differed more significantly in several compartmental volumes (NBV, NGMV and NWMV) from the HC group, suggesting higher overall atrophy compared to our CIS and RRMS groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This contrasts findings in MS cohorts with a wider spectrum of disability in which a relation of SDMT to whole brain measures (brain volume, T2 lesion volume) was evident (63), while evidence of such relationship in patients with early relapsing-remitting MS or CIS is sparse (63, 64). Consistent with our findings, more recent studies in early RRMS or CIS cohorts (32, 65, 66) were unable to confirm correlations of SDMT performance with volumetric brain measures while Bisecco et al have reported on thalamic atrophy as an independent and additional contributor to SDMT variance in a cross-sectional analysis controlled for sex and age of 125 RRMS patients (mean age 37 years, median EDSS 2) (67). However, they used a different analytic approach (voxel-based morphometry analysis) and the MS group differed more significantly in several compartmental volumes (NBV, NGMV and NWMV) from the HC group, suggesting higher overall atrophy compared to our CIS and RRMS groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Whilst the existing body of literature generally confirms such association in MS cohorts with significant disability, evidence on functional correlates of brain atrophy in CIS and early RRMS patients is less compelling (31, 32). The scope of this study was therefore to explore the relation of imaging markers of disease severity with the above-mentioned hallmark parameters of functional decline in a cohort of mildly disabled CIS and RRMS patients (EDSS ≤3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the longitudinal analysis of the present study, the patients showed stabilization or improvement in VEM performance, corroborating the findings of some longitudinal studies 17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24 , yet contrasting with others showing decline 4,6,25,26 in this domain. These incongruent findings have been reported in recently-published systematic reviews on the subject 1,2,3 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For example, in five cross‐sectional18, 23, 24, 25, 26 and two longitudinal studies,2, 38 which included between 43 and 81 patients in very early stages of MS, no significant associations between MRI lesion burden and cognitive measures were reported. Four of these studies also examined the relationships between global or regional brain atrophy and cognitive measures but found no associations 2, 24, 25, 26. Other studies did not find associations between MRI and cognitive measures presumably due to the small sample size and heterogeneity of studied cohorts 17, 19, 20, 21…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%