1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6629(199807)26:4<327::aid-jcop3>3.0.co;2-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal assessment of family support among homeless mentally ill participants in a supported housing program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These included permanent supportive housing (PSH; Drake, Yovetich, Bebout, Harris, & McHugo, 1997; Hickert & Taylor, 2011; O'Connell, Kasprow, & Rosenheck, 2012, 2017; Pankratz et al. 2017; Wood, Hurlburt, Hough, & Hofstetter, 1998; n = 6; 28.6%), assertive case management ( n = 2; 9.5%; Pickett‐Schenk, Cook, Grey, & Butler, 2007; Wasylenki, Goering, Lemire, Lindsey, & Lancee, 1993) and critical time intervention (CTI; n = 1; 4.8%). All of these studies evaluated the effectiveness of each intervention on social integration, one on physical integration (Hickert & Taylor, 2011), and none on psychological integration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These included permanent supportive housing (PSH; Drake, Yovetich, Bebout, Harris, & McHugo, 1997; Hickert & Taylor, 2011; O'Connell, Kasprow, & Rosenheck, 2012, 2017; Pankratz et al. 2017; Wood, Hurlburt, Hough, & Hofstetter, 1998; n = 6; 28.6%), assertive case management ( n = 2; 9.5%; Pickett‐Schenk, Cook, Grey, & Butler, 2007; Wasylenki, Goering, Lemire, Lindsey, & Lancee, 1993) and critical time intervention (CTI; n = 1; 4.8%). All of these studies evaluated the effectiveness of each intervention on social integration, one on physical integration (Hickert & Taylor, 2011), and none on psychological integration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2014) and subsequently used as modified scale in other studies (O'Campo et al., 2016; Patterson et al., 2014; Stergiopoulos et al., 2016). Other standardised scales used in full or in part to measure CI included: Lehman's Quality of Life Interview (Lehman, 1983; n = 2; 9.5%; O'Connell et al., 2017; Wood et al., 1998); Social Provisions Scale (Cutrona & Russell, 1987; n = 2; 9.5%; Pankratz et al., 2017; Stewart et al., 2009); ASR (Achenbach, 1997; n = 2; 9.5%); Multnomah Community Ability Scale (Hendryx, Dyck, McBride, & Whitbeck, 2001; n = 1; 4.8%; Aubry et al., 2016); UCLA‐LS‐R (Russell et al., 1980; n = 1; 4.8%; Stewart et al., 2009); SCS‐R (Lee et al, 2001; n = 1; 4.8%; McCay et al., 2011); MOS‐SSS (Sherbourne & Stewart, 1991; n = 1; 4.8%; Boisvert et al., 2008); and ASI (McLellan et al, 1992; n = 1; 4.8%; Devine et al., 1997). Although some of these scales were designed to measure constructs other than CI (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, there were no differences found between consumers in supported housing and consumers in residential continuum programs with regard to increases in self-esteem , improvements in family relations (Wood et al 1998 In terms of employment, individuals living in residential continuum housing had higher than average scores on an employment index and a greater number of days worked in comparison to individuals in supported housing (O'Connell, Kasprow and Rosenheck 2009); however, both groups reported significant increases in the number of days worked in the past 30 days and in their total income. With regard to legal involvement, one study found no significant differences among individuals in supported housing, case management only or standard care .…”
Section: Findings On Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Few studies have examined the role of family contact and support in improving housing stability among homeless persons with mental illness. Wood et al (1998) examined changes in family support among 316 homeless persons receiving case management services and access to Section 8 housing. At study entry, 32% of participants had seven or more days of contact (defined as in-person, phone, or mail contact) with a family member in the past 60 days.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%