2011
DOI: 10.5558/tfc2011-011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longer-Term Volume Trade-offs in Spruce and Jack Pine Plantations Following Various Conifer Release Treatments

Abstract: We assessed growth responses 10 years post treatment for 31 combinations of site, species, and treatments from six studies in Ontario, Canada, to determine if conifer release treatments increase gross total conifer volumes but decrease gross total stand volumes in boreal forests. Treatments included single and multiple herbicide application or motor-manual and mechanical conifer release. Treatment effects on 10 th -year gross total preferred conifer and total stand volumes ranged from -49% to +556% and -71% to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The glyphosate (i.e., Vision) treatment was the most effective vegetation management practice on this site for releasing conifers (Bell et al 2011a, this issue), and did not cause any major shifts in presence/absence of songbird species. However, the fact that we were able to detect differences in relative abundance of bird species in the Visiontreated areas compared to the untreated areas 11 years post treatment suggests that short-term responses are not indicative of longer-term responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The glyphosate (i.e., Vision) treatment was the most effective vegetation management practice on this site for releasing conifers (Bell et al 2011a, this issue), and did not cause any major shifts in presence/absence of songbird species. However, the fact that we were able to detect differences in relative abundance of bird species in the Visiontreated areas compared to the untreated areas 11 years post treatment suggests that short-term responses are not indicative of longer-term responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, which is one of a series of papers related to forest vegetation management published in the March/April 2011 issue of The Forestry Chronicle (see Bell et al 2011a), we report the response of bird communities 11 years post treatment on the Fallingsnow Ecosystem Project. We anticipated a several-year response of songbird community composition to vegetation management treatments due to the high philopatry that male songbirds sometimes show to their breeding sites (Hobson et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, results were influenced by site quality, initial stocking of preferred conifers, stem densities, treatment type, and application timing. Bell et al (2011a) suggest that it is unlikely that any one treatment will be universally effective and recommend that treatment choice be based on site and species ecology, treatment efficacy, and forest management objectives.…”
Section: Are the Alternatives Silviculturally Effective?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, landscape-level implications and the indirect effects of herbicide reduction on forest management objectives related to wildlife habitat supply, quantity of old growth, wood supply, and forest management infrastructure (such as road networks) are less well known. While vegetation management alternatives may result in similar composition (Dampier et al 2006), growth rates (Bell et al 2011a), and wildlife habitat at the stand level (Lautenschlager et al 1997, Fortier et al 2005, Swift and Bell 2011, even subtle differences could equate to significant landscape-level changes when applied to millions of hectares over long periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reductions in the use of herbicides are generally countered by increased use of alternatives and/or practices such as planting large stock, leaving advanced regeneration, or adopting a less intensive treatment package (McCarthy et al 2010, Thiffault andRoy 2010). The direct, stand-level silvicultural effects (e.g., lower yields of some conifers, increased hardwood from sprouting, more hardwood cull) resulting from vegetation management alternatives such as motor-manual tending (brush saw treatments) have recently been summarized (Bell et al 2011a, this issue, Homagain et al 2011, this issue, Wiensczyk et al 2011). However, landscape-level implications and the indirect effects of herbicide reduction on forest management objectives related to wildlife habitat supply, quantity of old growth, wood supply, and forest management infrastructure (such as road networks) are less well known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%